Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   <cy_huang@richtek.com>
To:     <linux@roeck-us.net>, <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
CC:     <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <gene_chen@richtek.com>,
        <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix altmode re-registration causes sysfs create fail
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:19:50 +0800
Message-ID: <1673248790-15794-1-git-send-email-cy_huang@richtek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>

There's the altmode re-registeration issue after data role
swap (DR_SWAP).

Comparing to USBPD 2.0, in USBPD 3.0, it loose the limit that only DFP
can initiate the VDM command to get partner identity information.

For a USBPD 3.0 UFP device, it may already get the identity information
from its port partner before DR_SWAP. If DR_SWAP send or receive at the
mean time, 'send_discover' flag will be raised again. It causes discover
identify action restart while entering ready state. And after all
discover actions are done, the 'tcpm_register_altmodes' will be called.
If old altmode is not unregistered, this sysfs create fail can be found.

In 'DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR' state case, only DFP will unregister altmodes.
For UFP, the original altmodes keep registered.

This patch fix the logic that after DR_SWAP, 'tcpm_unregister_altmodes'
must be called whatever the current data role is.

Reviewed-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
Fixes: ae8a2ca8a221 ("usb: typec: Group all TCPCI/TCPM code together)
Reported-by: TommyYl Chen <tommyyl.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
---
Since v2:
- Correct the mail sent from Richtek.
- Add 'Reviewed-by' tag.

Hi, Greg:

  Please check this one. I have strongly requested our MIS to remove the confidential string.

ChiYuan Huang.
---
 drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
index 904c7b4..59b366b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
@@ -4594,14 +4594,13 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port)
 		tcpm_set_state(port, ready_state(port), 0);
 		break;
 	case DR_SWAP_CHANGE_DR:
-		if (port->data_role == TYPEC_HOST) {
-			tcpm_unregister_altmodes(port);
+		tcpm_unregister_altmodes(port);
+		if (port->data_role == TYPEC_HOST)
 			tcpm_set_roles(port, true, port->pwr_role,
 				       TYPEC_DEVICE);
-		} else {
+		else
 			tcpm_set_roles(port, true, port->pwr_role,
 				       TYPEC_HOST);
-		}
 		tcpm_ams_finish(port);
 		tcpm_set_state(port, ready_state(port), 0);
 		break;
-- 
2.7.4