Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp6356843rwl; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:24:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXspCPf3zfIukb4R1oBgGkb8CGQEa1PXpRFiSSuRhca8n28joMKK+Yu5phCY/zYVRBp+ZKJc X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8688:b0:192:fc9c:a238 with SMTP id g8-20020a170902868800b00192fc9ca238mr14845095plo.66.1673277882807; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:24:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673277882; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xOQ2U3hC3ED9wdsfuNmKAW8JE/VyBO+LB9IGhGp71SlYeWttCsgQuRtDpnD/4V2b13 fZnoITZOachCjzB3ThifsVCCh/Xmpv0BgtXA6ozc7POueAYBa1TxwI7RF+mLIiM4r3ZC 8tM9nVE/XuVvjWmqqdnKj0vPg+ebdk0RTJw0DUd2PF1+my0FRJXv+aFoDPkEKF4+cmhv i7VA24AqdTuCzf/cqmLxsenKfbD2RTs2kjMqWi6kjysQbHWeITG4ND4xeH5nfgRB3El8 iYWVb8I0hsIP7a8mvs4J1F24G9/V5ME00P7Ex2GAv3kDwOFXH4RMp9KKyPdQ63dbXuN5 N8qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/aosjVf9wnG2odvEfIQHwOZ4v3JbIECRX2kB0cfaaik=; b=uACsH+DTJJ12Wfr9Eeju6EwJ5db/BUTAZUUkLIznUo8Rv5GQkDQBhgvjU9v48kRQnv G0sHxUVl7KLGr4WLw2HwqA0t/Fpz4ck6bgtlnb9BPLuBwnbqRAsFY6qf/o6nyZNqAYOR 0kT+0aBSmtvaYXObCDv3vObCDzPh+3zMD8X29/pTI6IqSx/I8lHPCn72FtsQqcZ6cLPT WQ3OyZYuxXYE153HS2rr/T3JC0+g1RWakcqeU0vDOkzWL8801cJFvNPchBksZs1DGvIe y+MM/JEc5b7Zw8jHA5vgy66+ieFrv5xyn+bpdKGAUhCbAGFciSH9ORjAQh/bCt2kTSno guRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k2-20020a170902d58200b00189574de848si8943900plh.170.2023.01.09.07.24.36; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:24:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236367AbjAIPSQ (ORCPT + 53 others); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:18:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237211AbjAIPR5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:17:57 -0500 Received: from outbound-smtp47.blacknight.com (outbound-smtp47.blacknight.com [46.22.136.64]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A04955A1 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:17:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail04.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.17]) by outbound-smtp47.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B80FA8A7 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:17:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 19193 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2023 15:17:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO morpheus.112glenside.lan) (mgorman@techsingularity.net@[84.203.198.246]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPA; 9 Jan 2023 15:17:45 -0000 From: Mel Gorman To: Linux-MM Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , NeilBrown , Thierry Reding , Matthew Wilcox , Vlastimil Babka , LKML , Mel Gorman Subject: [PATCH 6/7] mm/page_alloc: Give GFP_ATOMIC and non-blocking allocations access to reserves Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:16:30 +0000 Message-Id: <20230109151631.24923-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20230109151631.24923-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> References: <20230109151631.24923-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Explicit GFP_ATOMIC allocations get flagged ALLOC_HARDER which is a bit vague. In preparation for removing __GFP_ATOMIC, give GFP_ATOMIC and other non-blocking allocation requests equal access to reserve. Rename ALLOC_HARDER to ALLOC_NON_BLOCK to make it more clear what the flag means. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman --- mm/internal.h | 7 +++++-- mm/page_alloc.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 8706d46863df..23a37588073a 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -735,7 +735,10 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone, #define ALLOC_OOM ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS #endif -#define ALLOC_HARDER 0x10 /* try to alloc harder */ +#define ALLOC_NON_BLOCK 0x10 /* Caller cannot block. Allow access + * to 25% of the min watermark or + * 62.5% if __GFP_HIGH is set. + */ #define ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE 0x20 /* __GFP_HIGH set. Allow access to 50% * of the min watermark. */ @@ -750,7 +753,7 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone, #define ALLOC_KSWAPD 0x800 /* allow waking of kswapd, __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM set */ /* Flags that allow allocations below the min watermark. */ -#define ALLOC_RESERVES (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE|ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_OOM) +#define ALLOC_RESERVES (ALLOC_NON_BLOCK|ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE|ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_OOM) enum ttu_flags; struct tlbflush_unmap_batch; diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index d2df78f5baa2..2217bab2dbb2 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -3999,7 +3999,7 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, unsigned long mark, * if it cannot get memory quickly, particularly if it's * also __GFP_HIGH. */ - if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER) + if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NON_BLOCK) min -= min / 4; /* @@ -4851,28 +4851,30 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) * The caller may dip into page reserves a bit more if the caller * cannot run direct reclaim, or if the caller has realtime scheduling * policy or is asking for __GFP_HIGH memory. GFP_ATOMIC requests will - * set both ALLOC_HARDER (__GFP_ATOMIC) and ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE(__GFP_HIGH). + * set both ALLOC_NON_BLOCK and ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE(__GFP_HIGH). */ alloc_flags |= (__force int) (gfp_mask & (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)); - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_ATOMIC) { + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) { /* * Not worth trying to allocate harder for __GFP_NOMEMALLOC even * if it can't schedule. */ if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)) { - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER; + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NON_BLOCK; if (order > 0) alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC; } /* - * Ignore cpuset mems for GFP_ATOMIC rather than fail, see the - * comment for __cpuset_node_allowed(). + * Ignore cpuset mems for non-blocking __GFP_HIGH (probably + * GFP_ATOMIC) rather than fail, see the comment for + * __cpuset_node_allowed(). */ - alloc_flags &= ~ALLOC_CPUSET; + if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE) + alloc_flags &= ~ALLOC_CPUSET; } else if (unlikely(rt_task(current)) && in_task()) alloc_flags |= ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE; @@ -5304,11 +5306,12 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, /* * Help non-failing allocations by giving them access to memory - * reserves but do not use ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS because this + * reserves normally used for high priority non-blocking + * allocations but do not use ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS because this * could deplete whole memory reserves which would just make - * the situation worse + * the situation worse. */ - page = __alloc_pages_cpuset_fallback(gfp_mask, order, ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE|ALLOC_HARDER, ac); + page = __alloc_pages_cpuset_fallback(gfp_mask, order, ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE|ALLOC_NON_BLOCK, ac); if (page) goto got_pg; -- 2.35.3