Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S284775AbRLHUej>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:34:39 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S284787AbRLHUe3>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:34:29 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:34825 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S284775AbRLHUeQ>; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:34:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up
To: zaitcev@redhat.com (Pete Zaitcev)
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 20:43:26 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), zaitcev@redhat.com (Pete Zaitcev),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20011208113619.B7913@devserv.devel.redhat.com> from "Pete Zaitcev" at Dec 08, 2001 11:36:19 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16CoJj-0002bK-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> BTW, it was pointed out that my analyzis of the init_mem_lth
> was completely wrong - there is no bug that I thought is there.
> So I better be careful with 2.4 changes.

Its merely hideously ugly and without taste. I didn't think there was 
anything else wrong with it 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/