Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2023 21:38:09 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com,
        peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC/soundwire: revisit support for clock
 registers
Message-ID: <Y7w76Vv12JBJAOP9@matsya>
References: <20221118025807.534863-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221118025807.534863-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 18-11-22, 10:58, Bard Liao wrote:
> SoundWire clock base and scale registers are only supported for SDCA
> devices. That's fine, but that leaves SoundWire 1.2 with optional
> registers not supported. This is a corner case that needs to be supported.
> 
> The change is mainly on soundwire. But rt1318-sdw.c was applied to
> ASoC tree recently and not in SoundWire tree yet. @Vinod, Are you good
> if we go throutgh ASoC tree? Or @Mark can provide a tag and we can go
> through SoundWire tree?

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod