Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:37:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:36:59 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:37129 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:36:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 20:45:07 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti), akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <15378.17075.960942.357075@napali.hpl.hp.com> from "David Mosberger" at Dec 08, 2001 08:41:23 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Alan> x86_udelay_tsc wont have been set at that point so the main > Alan> timer is still being used. > > x86 does use current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy in the non-TSC case, no? I believe so. So we should propogate that across earlier, although its not needed for our current console drivers that I can see - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/