Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cc:b0:ea:6187:17c9 with SMTP id r12csp6693563rwl; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 11:41:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuLPYy6A+GUxaPl47nAEszkHqnVzO7uoaU1H4jAUwAX6YNUpd7BhQEyS4fTpWWVzSFn5fVa X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:874c:b0:7fc:4242:f9ec with SMTP id qo12-20020a170907874c00b007fc4242f9ecmr55413604ejc.43.1673293280538; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 11:41:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673293280; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KOq/PxpVRopCrAFkNuCHZYadV5ETISIPBAf8RBua3lzEXi+CikUJYA80s3LkKnFhe1 m6pt6bmrTg2pW96PzDGI79v2J7UZvZqcyoc2v8KnO6UpGu7SGtwxao5Qt8YRTS3wDaXf 7d4xM+rUzXPX3DGx0HBaogkz11AaPVyrQ9ArCt58AtS0uqzTz7afRcyZLrw+s50/mQ1B 3iuFUufe+AY5hwD0TumPWZWHy7vYDTXX6APvD25Cwxdax2hSOBWm+zWwGxBL1zGXGrCx Z5q8nwuSh+kDtcvStoCF5ke6czoyEZ2d+7n/Qtls74JC9oJNuZJ0jXchUJDzNokMYoW6 hXuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=VSLCkgRxPXWXMTSkxLq4wqVTmi1HEC8Jc15sBo3hsxU=; b=ah2Z0WoF79ZwYt7+QI85saAF89jDv6Owbd30EcAYhgyGz2Kp7D+4vvX8QdgDkw7w2h rFDgtsag3kwFOiVgDI2WT525c71xFdD9ekIi5NjAQuS8EB7vV7Qa0DCtcqM6dXMFMb32 ey6Oi90/aWGZjmwuHjxjF4jXFHgBsWVhai/S157BysK6uigagQgT7xCEL6eWIm1AME26 h4B5HpZyQGHu7zVwOEcPF204JTQpU1HBuKCaOrg+Zp3DkR34o/ipSi6s8A6cjtKtiZ91 3yc+n03GyyVnf2nWnQt6sJK5hokTGuwkZk0WU76GE0uqJOm9c25o9xwtpxUxIKOb88/M bRXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=o6BX2rq0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x19-20020a1709064bd300b0084d1ed9b67bsi7793178ejv.310.2023.01.09.11.41.06; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 11:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=o6BX2rq0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237337AbjAISr2 (ORCPT + 53 others); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:47:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36534 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237222AbjAISrY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:47:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F8E1A058 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id vm8so22497538ejc.2 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:47:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VSLCkgRxPXWXMTSkxLq4wqVTmi1HEC8Jc15sBo3hsxU=; b=o6BX2rq01AVrJKPxEo13bfQkBfaDVMK+QbxAZSUlU2ecB54iCbjdCSG/9fRT4kFNR2 9Lkpw/ICRmplQursH2brjIrKyYwCMpcFPev81YyObFN37wUnSCI71Ox2hF7eGH0utLtc PThzAHjJOFWiayUCPbqXLzIFGQ56l0tXJlLjxOdoRMZCn26Q8k5l9UFKaOWefkIOPEAf /1cF/mCknvjFeS2vQGJqGj/pQm3H6+SD49oR5WHqXTjkyqa1GPJzfPzWTQrzs1ggwodi S+MATMuYeJWMpXltu/DRtnz7+En9Ji0pGPt2Awnp6+zFRAfITvjMTM9jRacUJbHg9rTd 6lOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=VSLCkgRxPXWXMTSkxLq4wqVTmi1HEC8Jc15sBo3hsxU=; b=jfr+5md9lMTIruL44rMCwbSZXHgKXlje2/3dajtozqHypb3DQ3CMOUsIBeI54rPKJL UYoqNY7ZdYvfL68DrqGMVXKv8VCze3XiT5zJdxSsi+UkHIfm1FEkIau2tfWI3E08Qzg+ +Bfz+bXOHW0SrUNRB5ZZtaTYcrnNHbY07YiP1OgMIisNNt84SVDhx8ABMobmaO+LBIac Pm69Al79z5YcXQQL4HFoZfbMU5iYV2GVn1vZEcvpv2orKq/BsioqtQXcbFIH+8NNwR1r AHCXKuVJEJeknVkziiGSx4PjR7Kf3nxjmlPHkIfHoxsIFktPxGxXRA1bTGxQPA+2M6O1 lMOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krAcw7gRWomeVhqzrs07cXC4SM4XAzN6lC8ULvnlemfCsA7JVo8 aVmG8gMIP/qo36AmAc8VSa12sD5IpjyDwYqsKm+J5A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:91cd:b0:854:cd76:e982 with SMTP id h13-20020a17090791cd00b00854cd76e982mr46397ejz.364.1673290041879; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:47:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221221222418.3307832-1-bgardon@google.com> <20221221222418.3307832-5-bgardon@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ben Gardon Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:47:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 04/14] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for paging_tmpl.h To: David Matlack Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , Vipin Sharma , Nagareddy Reddy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 11:49 AM David Matlack wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:24:08PM +0000, Ben Gardon wrote: > > In preparation for moving paging_tmpl.h to shadow_mmu.c, expose various > > functions it needs through mmu_internal.h. This includes modifying the > > BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR macro so that it does not automatically include > > the static label, since some but not all of the accessors are needed by > > paging_tmpl.h. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > > index bf14e181eb12..a17e8a79e4df 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > > @@ -153,18 +153,18 @@ BUILD_MMU_ROLE_REGS_ACCESSOR(efer, lma, EFER_LMA); > > * and the vCPU may be incorrect/irrelevant. > > */ > > #define BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base_or_ext, reg, name) \ > > -static inline bool __maybe_unused is_##reg##_##name(struct kvm_mmu *mmu) \ > > +inline bool __maybe_unused is_##reg##_##name(struct kvm_mmu *mmu) \ > > { \ > > return !!(mmu->cpu_role. base_or_ext . reg##_##name); \ > > } > > BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base, cr0, wp); > > -BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pse); > > +static BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pse); > > BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, smep); > > -BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, smap); > > -BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pke); > > -BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, la57); > > +static BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, smap); > > +static BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, pke); > > +static BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, cr4, la57); > > BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base, efer, nx); > > -BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, efer, lma); > > +static BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext, efer, lma); > > Suggest moving all the BUILD_MMU_ROLE*() macros to mmu_internal.h, since > they are already static inline. That would be a cleaner patch and reduce > future churn if shadow_mmu.c ever needs to use a different role accessor > at some point. That sounds reasonable. Will do in V1. > > > > > static inline bool is_cr0_pg(struct kvm_mmu *mmu) > > { > > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(struct kvm *kvm, > > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_range(kvm, &range); > > } > > > > -static gfn_t get_mmio_spte_gfn(u64 spte) > > +gfn_t get_mmio_spte_gfn(u64 spte) > > { > > u64 gpa = spte & shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_lower_gfn_mask; > > > > @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static bool check_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 spte) > > return likely(kvm_gen == spte_gen); > > } > > > > -static int is_cpuid_PSE36(void) > > +int is_cpuid_PSE36(void) > > { > > return 1; > > } > > Can we just drop is_cpuid_PSE36(), e.g. as a precursor patch? It just > returns 1... Yeah, good idea. Looks like we can eliminate a little dead code doing that too.