Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:43:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:43:31 -0500 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:35566 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:43:20 -0500 From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 20:43:17 GMT Message-Id: To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Cox > Really someone needs slapping across. What kind of code is that > (in 2.5.1-pre6): Whoever merged that crap also wants a good kicking. First we have the joke ps/2 merge, now this. Is Linus trying to force someone to take over or is small children combined with a pending christmas really the doom that some folks claim 8) Alan, Alan, Please calm down. Linus is doing a good job, and whenever things go slightly wrong someone comes along to point out the flaw. Moreover, I can assure you that pending christmas and small children really is a very nice time. And then, my beautiful code is not at all crap that should not have been applied. It fixes a real bug. But there was another bug there that it left, namely that the freed pointers should have been zeroed, so that nobody can come and use them with random results. If nobody else does it, I'll send also that small fix, but maybe not today. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/