Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:56:23 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Cc:     axboe@kernel.dk, kernel@pankajraghav.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, bvanassche@acm.org,
        snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] dm-zoned: ensure only power of 2 zone sizes are
 allowed
Message-ID: <20230110065623.GD10289@lst.de>
References: <20230106083317.93938-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> <CGME20230106083322eucas1p2414f1f7f121fbbd7a0e5e1b1b622f5c0@eucas1p2.samsung.com> <20230106083317.93938-6-p.raghav@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230106083317.93938-6-p.raghav@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

Given that we don't even support the non pow of 2 zones in the block
layer I don't see why this is needed.  But either way it doesn't really
seem to fit into this series.