Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:25:17 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] nolibc: add support for the s390 platform
Message-ID: <20230110092517.GA4626@1wt.eu>
References: <20230109080910.26594-1-w@1wt.eu>
 <20230109191534.GU4028633@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <20230110073242.GB3229@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230110073242.GB3229@1wt.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:09:06AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hello Paul,
> > > 
> > > this series adds support for the s390x platform to nolibc and rcutorture,
> > > reducing the init size from ~600kB to ~1kB. The work was contributed by
> > > Sven Schnelle. It depends on the fixes series I sent previously:
> > > 
> > >   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230109075442.25963-1-w@1wt.eu/
> > > 
> > > It passes the self-tests correctly and the patches are clean, please
> > > consider queuing it.
> > 
> > "80 test(s) passed" and successful exit code.  I will assume that the
> > decrease in tests from 81 to 80 is intended.  I have these queued,
> > but it may be some hours before they are externally visible.
> 
> Interesting, I didn't notice and I'm not observing this when running
> qemu-s390x (the userland version), I'm currently rebuilding the kernel
> to compare and will let you know. Thanks for checking!

So after a re-check, I'm constantly seeing 82 tests passed and a success
here. I don't understand what's differing, and would be interested in a
copy of your "run.out" in the "tools/testing/selftests/nolibc" subdir to
compare with mine, as it's possible we have a bug somewhere in the way
tests are run (or maybe we're still facing a mangled qemu output).

You can just send this to me privately, no need to spam the list, the
file is moderately large and uninteresting.

Thanks!
Willy