Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221221105402.6598-1-markuss.broks@gmail.com>
 <CAMj1kXGUC7dsSwVEUsAMeAoqDYtbqrM7SDOJTXbPfi-LrcSk9g@mail.gmail.com> <Y6xMnuMqpThmFn1q@smile.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y6xMnuMqpThmFn1q@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:30:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFtmK0jOt1Boeb6t=DoyVg6xWgCMVEB59jCm8zz7XcNAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add generic framebuffer support to EFI earlycon driver
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@protonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 15:04, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > (cc Andy)
>
> I believe there are two reasons I'm Cc'ed now:
> - the Cc was forgotten. because I remember reviewing some parts
>   of this contribution
> - this conflicts (to some extent) with my patch that speeds up
>   the scrolling
>
> For the first it's obvious what to do, I think Markuss can include me
> in his v4.
>
> For the second I don't see the functional clash. The scrolling in this
> series is not anyhow optimized. I think my patch should go first as
> - it is less intrusive
> - it has been tested, or can be tested easily
>
> Tell me if I'm missing something here.
>

Thanks for your input.