Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Improvements to BTI tests on non-BTI systems
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:49:58 +0000
Message-Id: <20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-v1-0-143ecdc84567@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

While looking at the BTI selftest results on a non-BTI system I noticed
that not only are we printing invalid test numbers in that case, we're
skipping running the tests entirely even though there's a well defined
ABI we could be verifying and the code already knows what the results
should be.

The first patch here is a fix to the reporting of test numbers when
skipping, the second one just removes the skipping entirely in favour of
a runtime check for what the result of a BTI binary should be.

To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

---
Mark Brown (2):
      kselftest/arm64: Fix test numbering when skipping tests
      kselftest/arm64: Run BTI selftests on systems without BTI

 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/test.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: b7bfaa761d760e72a969d116517eaa12e404c262
change-id: 20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-9fdf5e94fb62

Best regards,
-- 
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>