Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230106102332.1019632-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
 <20230106102332.1019632-7-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <20230111061054.dqduab66plb6uzg2@macbook-pro-6.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230111061054.dqduab66plb6uzg2@macbook-pro-6.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:47:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJLk7dNYHiharC0wR0563aTE9NfD_jE5qxdoM9m0pW__cA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH HID for-next v1 6/9] HID: bpf: rework how programs are
 attached and stored in the kernel
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:11 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >
> > +static void hid_bpf_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
> > +{
> > +     struct hid_bpf_link *hid_link =
> > +             container_of(link, struct hid_bpf_link, link);
> > +
> > +     __clear_bit(hid_link->index, jmp_table.enabled);
> > +     schedule_work(&release_work);
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > +     link->index = prog_idx;
>
> I was super confused that you use prog_idx as a bit in jmp_table
> and had to look into your tree what hid_bpf_jmp_table.c is doing.
> Looks like it's not prog_id (which is prog->aux->id) that we know.
> It's hid specific prog idx in that jmp table.
> Maybe would be good to rename your prog_idx to something with 'hid' suffix or prefix?
> or 'table' suffix or prefix ?
> prog_table_idx ?

prog_table_idx sounds good :)

>
> Other than that the patch set looking great.

great, thanks!

> I'm assuming removing call_hid_bpf_prog_put_deferred() and everything related
> comes in the next set?
>

Yep. I'll probably send it tomorrow. I have a bunch of urgent
corporate stuff to do today so won't have time for the fun part of the
job :(

Cheers,
Benjamin