Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To:     DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:41:03 +0100
Message-Id: <20230111154112.90575-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20230111154112.90575-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
References: <20230111154112.90575-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

This one nukes all framebuffers, which is a bit much. In reality
gma500 is igpu and never shipped with anything discrete, so there should
not be any difference.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
index cd9c73f5a64a..9b0daf90dc50 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int psb_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	 * TODO: Refactor psb_driver_load() to map vdc_reg earlier. Then we
 	 *       might be able to read the framebuffer range from the device.
 	 */
-	ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(true, &driver);
+	ret = drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(pdev, &driver);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.0