Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230109205336.3665937-1-surenb@google.com> <20230109205336.3665937-14-surenb@google.com>
 <20230111154726.stadwtzicabwh5u5@offworld>
In-Reply-To: <20230111154726.stadwtzicabwh5u5@offworld>
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:36:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFmO310qoFJr2EKHRavLx87k6tVkHO3-JCE0s4q5g+TCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] mm: introduce vma->vm_flags modifier functions
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        michel@lespinasse.org, jglisse@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
        vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
        willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        ldufour@linux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com,
        paulmck@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
        peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
        hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
        punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, lstoakes@gmail.com,
        peterjung1337@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
        axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com, minchan@google.com,
        jannh@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, tatashin@google.com,
        edumazet@google.com, gthelen@google.com, gurua@google.com,
        arjunroy@google.com, soheil@google.com, hughlynch@google.com,
        leewalsh@google.com, posk@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:13 AM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2023, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>
> >To keep vma locking correctness when vm_flags are modified, add modifier
> >functions to be used whenever flags are updated.
>
> How about moving this patch and the ones that follow out of this series,
> into a preliminary patchset? It would reduce the amount of noise in the
> per-vma lock changes, which would then only be adding the needed
> vma_write_lock()ing.

How about moving those prerequisite patches to the beginning of the
patchset (before maple_tree RCU changes)? I feel like they do belong
in the patchset because as a standalone patchset it would be unclear
why I'm adding all these accessor functions and introducing this
churn. Would that be acceptable?

>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
>