Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:25:15 -0600
From:   Justin Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/148] 6.0.19-rc1 review
Message-ID: <Y77w+5mqOR+n5G9K@fedora64.linuxtx.org>
References: <20230110180017.145591678@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230110180017.145591678@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:01:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.19 release.
> There are 148 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> NOTE, this will probably be the LAST 6.0.y release.  If there is
> anything preventing you from moving to 6.1.y right now, please let me
> know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:59:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.19-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.

Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>