Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/6] genirq/affinity: Abstract APIs from managed irq
 affinity spread
In-Reply-To: <Y74cXN4SP7FNtSl3@T590>
References: <20221227022905.352674-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
 <Y74cXN4SP7FNtSl3@T590>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:58:50 +0100
Message-ID: <87zgaoew45.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 10:18, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:28:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> irq_build_affinity_masks() actually grouping CPUs evenly into each managed
>> irq vector according to NUMA and CPU locality, and it is reasonable to abstract
>> one generic API for grouping CPUs evenly, the idea is suggested by Thomas
>> Gleixner.
>> 
>> group_cpus_evenly() is abstracted and put into lib/, so blk-mq can re-use
>> it to build default queue mapping.
>> 
>> blk-mq IO perf data is observed as more stable, meantime with big
>> improvement, see detailed data in the last patch.
>> 
>> Please consider it for v6.3!
>> 
>> V4:
>> 	- address comments from John, not export the API, given so far no
>> 	  module uses this symbol
>> 	- add maintainer entry for new added lib/group_cpus.c
>> 	- rebase on 6.2
>
> Any chance to take a look at this patchset?

I'm at it. My sickness+vacation induced backlog is horrible ....