Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762983AbXHVOIh (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:08:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760494AbXHVOIa (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:08:30 -0400 Received: from namei.org ([69.55.235.186]:35448 "EHLO us.intercode.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760232AbXHVOI3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:08:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@us.intercode.com.au To: Stephen Smalley cc: Michal Piotrowski , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review In-Reply-To: <1187790174.1451.315.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Message-ID: References: <20070822083844.%N@1wt.eu> <6bffcb0e0708220410u4ab3978eq18786ac186e88c7d@mail.gmail.com> <1187789765.1451.310.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1187790174.1451.315.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 607 Lines: 18 On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote: > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter. > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables > secmark rule. Michal, do you see this in current git? -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/