Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>, Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] genirq/irqdomain/msi: Add
 irq_domain_alloc_irqs_affinity() wrapper
In-Reply-To: <20221213140844.15470-3-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
References: <20221213140844.15470-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <20221213140844.15470-3-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:52:42 +0100
Message-ID: <87358ggayt.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 13 2022 at 15:08, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The full __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() interface was initially only intended
> for some legacy (x86) use cases while most callers should use the
> irq_domain_alloc_irqs() wrapper.
>
> Add a matching irq_domain_alloc_irqs_affinity() wrapper that can be used
> when an affinity hint needs to be provided and use it for MSI
> allocations.

I definitely like the irqchip cleanup, but this one is core code and
having the extra wrapper is not really buying us much.

Thanks,

        tglx