Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:45:09 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/6] genirq/affinity: Abstract APIs from managed irq
 affinity spread
Message-ID: <Y79mJVAw4/tFZ7sp@T590>
References: <20221227022905.352674-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
 <Y74cXN4SP7FNtSl3@T590>
 <87zgaoew45.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zgaoew45.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:58:50PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 10:18, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:28:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> irq_build_affinity_masks() actually grouping CPUs evenly into each managed
> >> irq vector according to NUMA and CPU locality, and it is reasonable to abstract
> >> one generic API for grouping CPUs evenly, the idea is suggested by Thomas
> >> Gleixner.
> >> 
> >> group_cpus_evenly() is abstracted and put into lib/, so blk-mq can re-use
> >> it to build default queue mapping.
> >> 
> >> blk-mq IO perf data is observed as more stable, meantime with big
> >> improvement, see detailed data in the last patch.
> >> 
> >> Please consider it for v6.3!
> >> 
> >> V4:
> >> 	- address comments from John, not export the API, given so far no
> >> 	  module uses this symbol
> >> 	- add maintainer entry for new added lib/group_cpus.c
> >> 	- rebase on 6.2
> >
> > Any chance to take a look at this patchset?
> 
> I'm at it. My sickness+vacation induced backlog is horrible ....

Thanks for the response, and wish you good health.


thanks, 
Ming