Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:02:16 -0800
From:   Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/159] 6.1.5-rc1 review
Message-ID: <20230112030216.GB17118@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <20230110180018.288460217@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230110180018.288460217@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:02:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.5 release.
> There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:59:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

No regressions found on WSL x86_64 or WSL arm64

Built, booted, and compared dmesg against 6.1.4. Also haven't
encountered any problems so far using 6.1.y compared to 5.15.y on WSL.
:)  

Thank you.

Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>