Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:03:35 +0000
From:   Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>, wei.liu@kernel.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
        decui@microsoft.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
        kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
        hch@infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        jane.chu@oracle.com, seanjc@google.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 00/13] Add PCI pass-thru support to Hyper-V
 Confidential VMs
Message-ID: <Y8ATN9mPCx6P4vB6@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
References: <1669951831-4180-1-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
 <Y7xhLCgCq0MOsqxH@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y7xhLCgCq0MOsqxH@zn.tnic>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:47:08PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:30:18PM -0800, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for PCI pass-thru devices to Hyper-V
> > Confidential VMs (also called "Isolation VMs"). But in preparation, it
> > first changes how private (encrypted) vs. shared (decrypted) memory is
> > handled in Hyper-V SEV-SNP guest VMs. The new approach builds on the
> > confidential computing (coco) mechanisms introduced in the 5.19 kernel
> > for TDX support and significantly reduces the amount of Hyper-V specific
> > code. Furthermore, with this new approach a proposed RFC patch set for
> > generic DMA layer functionality[1] is no longer necessary.
> 
> In any case, this is starting to get ready - how do we merge this?
> 
> I apply the x86 bits and give Wei an immutable branch to add the rest of the
> HyperV stuff ontop?

I can take all the patches if that's easier for you. I don't think
anyone else is depending on the x86 patches in this series.

Giving me an immutable branch works too.

Thanks,
Wei.

> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette