Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Improvements to BTI tests on non-BTI systems
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:48:40 +0000
Message-Id: <167354570430.3643775.1400892033904303107.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-v1-0-143ecdc84567@kernel.org>
References: <20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-v1-0-143ecdc84567@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:49:58 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> While looking at the BTI selftest results on a non-BTI system I noticed
> that not only are we printing invalid test numbers in that case, we're
> skipping running the tests entirely even though there's a well defined
> ABI we could be verifying and the code already knows what the results
> should be.
> 
> The first patch here is a fix to the reporting of test numbers when
> skipping, the second one just removes the skipping entirely in favour of
> a runtime check for what the result of a BTI binary should be.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!

[1/2] kselftest/arm64: Fix test numbering when skipping tests
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/30792e7c18b6
[2/2] kselftest/arm64: Run BTI selftests on systems without BTI
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1c3b614548b5

-- 
Catalin