Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <6f43e320-b533-e5fb-3886-1b6ccc7f9548@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:52:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: sram: Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230113073045.4008853-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230113073045.4008853-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 13/01/2023 08:30, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> This patch introduces bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx
> platforms. As of now TCM addresses are hardcoded in xilinx remoteproc
> driver. This bindings will help in defining TCM in device-tree and
> make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven from the driver.
> 

Subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The "dt-bindings"
prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

Where is driver or DTS? Are you now adding a dead binding without users?

Best regards,
Krzysztof