Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.117.160 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.117.160; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C
References: <20230112201554.752144-1-daniel.machon@microchip.com>
 <20230112201554.752144-4-daniel.machon@microchip.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.6.6; emacs 28.1
From:   Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
To:     Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
CC:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
        <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <joe@perches.com>,
        <error27@gmail.com>, <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
        <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>, <petrm@nvidia.com>,
        <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>, <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: dcb: add new rewrite table
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:51:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20230112201554.752144-4-daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Message-ID: <871qnyzajm.fsf@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2023 16:04:03.7018
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fb9fc8c0-4e97-41b1-4961-08daf57fcacf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.160];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DS1PEPF0000E644.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN0PR12MB6054
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FORGED_SPF_HELO,
        SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> writes:

> Add new rewrite table and all the required functions, offload hooks and
> bookkeeping for maintaining it. The rewrite table reuses the app struct,
> and the entire set of app selectors. As such, some bookeeping code can
> be shared between the rewrite- and the APP table.
>
> New functions for getting, setting and deleting entries has been added.
> Apart from operating on the rewrite list, these functions do not emit a
> DCB_APP_EVENT when the list os modified. The new dcb_getrewr does a
> lookup based on selector and priority and returns the protocol, so that
> mappings from priority to protocol, for a given selector and ifindex is
> obtained.

Yeah, the call_dcbevent_notifiers() business can be added when there are
any users.

>
> Also, a new nested attribute has been added, that encapsulates one or
> more app structs. This attribute is used to distinguish the two tables.
>
> The dcb_lock used for the APP table is reused for the rewrite table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>

No comments about the code besides what Dan has pointed out.