Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the workqueues tree
In-Reply-To: <Y8GHXUcXYJcHPkOY@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20230113143102.2e94d74f@canb.auug.org.au>
 <Y8GHXUcXYJcHPkOY@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:47:31 +0000
Message-ID: <xhsmhzgamidp8.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On 13/01/23 06:31, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 02:31:02PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the workqueues tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allnoconfig and several others) produced this warning:
>>
>> kernel/workqueue.c:1993:13: warning: 'rebind_worker' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>  1993 | static void rebind_worker(struct worker *worker, struct worker_pool *pool)
>>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Introduced by commit
>>
>>   793777bc193b ("workqueue: Factorize unbind/rebind_workers() logic")
>
> Valentin, this is caused by rebind_worker() being only used by
> rebind_workers() which is inside CONFIG_SMP. I don't see any other uses of
> rebind_worker(). Just fold it back into rebind_workers()?
>

Woops! Yes I only did it to keep things aligned with unbind_workers(), let
me resend with that folded back in. Sorry!

> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun