Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230112065336.41034-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <CAL+tcoB2ZpgM6HM+m=wF2EkQ5caeettcbeUQQBxpLWVuwSSxbw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL+tcoB2ZpgM6HM+m=wF2EkQ5caeettcbeUQQBxpLWVuwSSxbw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2023 10:26:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CANn89i+W_1ux=5ixjCdf9LoGuDb6LEJ_XgWCNcYztjPQ0R4L1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: avoid the lookup process failing to get sk in
 ehash table
To:     Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 3:15 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> So could someone please take some time to help me review the patch?
> It's not complicated. Thank you from the bottom of my heart in
> advance.


Sure.

Please be patient, and accept the fact that maintainers are
overwhelmed by mixes of patches and company work.

In the meantime, can you double check if the transition from
established to timewait socket is also covered by your patch ?