Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230112065336.41034-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
 <CAL+tcoB2ZpgM6HM+m=wF2EkQ5caeettcbeUQQBxpLWVuwSSxbw@mail.gmail.com> <CANn89i+W_1ux=5ixjCdf9LoGuDb6LEJ_XgWCNcYztjPQ0R4L1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+W_1ux=5ixjCdf9LoGuDb6LEJ_XgWCNcYztjPQ0R4L1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2023 17:48:02 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoBM6YkZgrRHLXXTwZw9rVNfbEk2SeXsz5Zf6ca9LartYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: avoid the lookup process failing to get sk in
 ehash table
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 5:27 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 3:15 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > So could someone please take some time to help me review the patch?
> > It's not complicated. Thank you from the bottom of my heart in
> > advance.
>
>
> Sure.
>
> Please be patient, and accept the fact that maintainers are
> overwhelmed by mixes of patches and company work.

I felt so sorry. I'm too anxious. Thanks for what you've contributed
to the net module really.

>
> In the meantime, can you double check if the transition from
> established to timewait socket is also covered by your patch ?

Yeah, I'll do that.

Thanks,
Jason