Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2023 10:58:33 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: also disable FSRM if ERMS is disabled
Message-ID: <Y8J8yUfSKdLOjGW0@zn.tnic>
References: <20220923005827.1533380-1-dverkamp@chromium.org>
 <Yy2U2BW6Tx0imGpK@zn.tnic>
 <CABVzXAk9AXj2Ns7YAh7cCA38t2sGxOEYLv-EfLCoFHr-SUQ2Mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yy3yJfz213Lqo4KC@zn.tnic>
 <CABVzXAkO4pU+gpUcWOEWDw+W4id=1WEOgeP5+3tBG_LR6=oa=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1b184587-128d-e5cc-67e9-1d27feb87213@kernel.org>
 <Y7VlZsaWz4/b6Phf@zn.tnic>
 <Y8JzrLuJ0EJRPFGQ@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y8JzrLuJ0EJRPFGQ@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 10:19:40AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So while you are technically correct that these are firmware bugs, I'm in 
> favor of robustifying our x86 memcpy routines against these bugs. Silently not
> booting, where no other OS fails to boot, is poor form IMO.

Yes, I know.

As I told you yesterday on IRC, I'll take care of it.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette