Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp610426rwb; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:44:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXs5afEaI/HooYdxlw9xXil6hUwyYrmhIoDJ++KpOE0k4D/hGmA7+EpXSM+e1mUru+7stlhH X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b38c:b0:229:680:1729 with SMTP id e12-20020a17090ab38c00b0022906801729mr9204004pjr.10.1673703839971; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:43:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673703839; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bi7inqOyc0z0lDUsYm+MisTJvId2kk/8qYyX99CJuxw7u9fjFxQkboxkpRzRDc3n8O R9awkHfQWaCzxizvh6pZi/k5oj3XoSkpDHQ1GIYNPhMKjfvzU5sMO0AQDe0LdDxUvrka 8OqwXPayrVAy3Ju5ARAKoemSSv0FcPCFUhwiygtrRCgOChzm7zKiw2AfQWkRTOUQpYLE MdTDBrHp4tmHH34m3KbTvGzrhZ9WKuJTzIqNcjAOaYDWP8xFAPwOfETQJL+x6LbrTvg1 47APEOJiT/v/UXSEx7u/0n+ebUhsZ+HaYS6yboD+GEJcT42PEpR1bvSuwj2toRqwB7by 2C0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=h3Srvg8gMya4A7dC+zbFGDFarP12psPNGrevloV3ZIE=; b=H3TaPVBgg1B2ugddELwQXDg9N4aFgXemNV9Petyf4FHddC/6KZekvBZp9PgRS6jP56 IyVe0yLovxYhbwRat4n0vPQP5S1UR3ZBpahtY2kjXmtR8o+Vr5/DfJVWbg+j8CM9+55y 3zShPd5iZDt2c1LzBJedzYtXDyr8Z5kC05UT6V9h6tSLX3TSxJtEAUFKK91nOnQCNR6L EE+Mc6YzmTOq4L3agQUUEMhup+FTf8YZ+tCLSQPDWhBlvzLlmrRRWlDSB7rL5SRo+9es gWd8JsOi8XhCi9YZ6idQ0QbKNvvoZCo6az/FqojrWBLS+bL9K9gy4RJTg7pgfoLKIA7C 9M6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=i5sl0EI7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i14-20020a63130e000000b0049f1702457bsi24673295pgl.685.2023.01.14.05.43.52; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:43:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=i5sl0EI7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230088AbjANN1i (ORCPT + 51 others); Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:27:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230063AbjANN1P (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:27:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF60902A; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id q23-20020a17090a065700b002290913a521so7359588pje.5; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h3Srvg8gMya4A7dC+zbFGDFarP12psPNGrevloV3ZIE=; b=i5sl0EI73aBU350Ih2a6okf/lB3lZNHtwcNjFgFiTaMoiWC5ef2VxuntrUzmw7mSHT 2ip60qxw+0qDBQsmXd+A7HMbPWP8R/2kBzh6aXfQdtmrZRkR4MX+UGzx6A5djqh7+uzp sJlEwRdkVqWv/2Iwen9KMRoYRt3FPKtqHmzCwpAajwB3aO6RMMq9/9a4CgS5Zifu0tkM jSWXVzH4KtCX8v8FEThtp0afTiqmo1AGHkesIQlYSO3T+Ps96V1M1xEAlurqryocarUI Vo1AwKCNOQ5KJih1kygHuhDlXQFubof0tTjnWZ0ikN8HvlECS3ioE+H2eHQrtzPAdvO8 34TQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=h3Srvg8gMya4A7dC+zbFGDFarP12psPNGrevloV3ZIE=; b=lLtykyEvzyMKmr5VRpQgvIBnVO0FfJlwHwsp6lZdIg3cnY8eknqXWHYmJ/IRdxbUkt QkUHyLimos2dkw2iAPeOBh6AfxkoQV2qF04ZtW8CxVfGb7SRZmgmn2G4WernAYp0yUnN NwsZAHnBRkuEeisPgvb6Ah+mwPLXmpqed0npLpiMK3F1mphaAmSyz8xg+y3spn2a5bvM Gz183GfP0/UBZ0eN1ROhFW1ypXFQe1ANgOZR5s2mxDLi0THVrd4rtMSsdRxYjhjkBKcQ VExTZFYQg+Ng57a5Qlhp5Fniq37W5ZL8Y32rmmr8MoHMsH6T2XTrGs+QPYHfzn4QmBVN BLZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krfP+ZY4fHpNjqn/IbsMFqk7VnZcEkIXJXMHcDnE5VlLaaV15l2 JqmFNXNeOoRvlDldn85tzkk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7309:b0:226:a617:44c1 with SMTP id m9-20020a17090a730900b00226a61744c1mr36852990pjk.13.1673702832210; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from KERNELXING-MB0.tencent.com ([114.253.32.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mz4-20020a17090b378400b0020aacde1964sm16001950pjb.32.2023.01.14.05.27.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 14 Jan 2023 05:27:11 -0800 (PST) From: Jason Xing To: edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com, Jason Xing Subject: [PATCH v2 net] tcp: avoid the lookup process failing to get sk in ehash table Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:27:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20230114132705.78400-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jason Xing While one cpu is working on looking up the right socket from ehash table, another cpu is done deleting the request socket and is about to add (or is adding) the big socket from the table. It means that we could miss both of them, even though it has little chance. Let me draw a call trace map of the server side. CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- tcp_v4_rcv() syn_recv_sock() inet_ehash_insert() -> sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(osk) __inet_lookup_established() -> __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, list) Notice that the CPU 0 is receiving the data after the final ack during 3-way shakehands and CPU 1 is still handling the final ack. Why could this be a real problem? This case is happening only when the final ack and the first data receiving by different CPUs. Then the server receiving data with ACK flag tries to search one proper established socket from ehash table, but apparently it fails as my map shows above. After that, the server fetches a listener socket and then sends a RST because it finds a ACK flag in the skb (data), which obeys RST definition in RFC 793. Besides, Eric pointed out there's one more race condition where it handles tw socket hashdance. Only by adding to the tail of the list before deleting the old one can we avoid the race if the reader has already begun the bucket traversal and it would possibly miss the head. Many thanks to Eric for great help from beginning to end. Fixes: 5e0724d027f0 ("tcp/dccp: fix hashdance race for passive sessions") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Jason Xing Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230112065336.41034-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/ --- v2: 1) adding the sk node into the tail of list to prevent the race. 2) fix the race condition when handling time-wait socket hashdance. --- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 10 ++++++++++ net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c index 24a38b56fab9..b0b54ad55507 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c @@ -650,7 +650,16 @@ bool inet_ehash_insert(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk, bool *found_dup_sk) spin_lock(lock); if (osk) { WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_hash != osk->sk_hash); + if (sk_hashed(osk)) + /* Before deleting the node, we insert a new one to make + * sure that the look-up-sk process would not miss either + * of them and that at least one node would exist in ehash + * table all the time. Otherwise there's a tiny chance + * that lookup process could find nothing in ehash table. + */ + __sk_nulls_add_node_tail_rcu(sk, list); ret = sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(osk); + goto unlock; } else if (found_dup_sk) { *found_dup_sk = inet_ehash_lookup_by_sk(sk, list); if (*found_dup_sk) @@ -660,6 +669,7 @@ bool inet_ehash_insert(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk, bool *found_dup_sk) if (ret) __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, list); +unlock: spin_unlock(lock); return ret; diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c index 1d77d992e6e7..6d681ef52bb2 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c @@ -91,10 +91,10 @@ void inet_twsk_put(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_twsk_put); -static void inet_twsk_add_node_rcu(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, +static void inet_twsk_add_node_tail_rcu(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct hlist_nulls_head *list) { - hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&tw->tw_node, list); + hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(&tw->tw_node, list); } static void inet_twsk_add_bind_node(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ void inet_twsk_hashdance(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sock *sk, spin_lock(lock); - inet_twsk_add_node_rcu(tw, &ehead->chain); + inet_twsk_add_node_tail_rcu(tw, &ehead->chain); /* Step 3: Remove SK from hash chain */ if (__sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(sk)) -- 2.37.3