Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <15573018-32df-b67f-fc37-44da0ed7afde@landley.net>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2023 17:45:59 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4
Content-Language: en-US
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Cc:     Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <961f3b42-1522-79d5-7012-1533b568696f@omp.ru>
 <09EB6264-E85C-487C-B706-6411BB18DDDF@physik.fu-berlin.de>
From:   Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
In-Reply-To: <09EB6264-E85C-487C-B706-6411BB18DDDF@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/13/23 12:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> The patch is against Linus Torvalds' 'linux.git' repo.
>> 
>>   So, this patch hasn't been merged... may I ask why? :-(
> 
> The SH maintainers have been MIA which is why the other maintainers want to kill the architecture again.

To clarify: Sato-san was only ever assisting Rich, as in promising to answer
questions when Rich didn't understand something. (That may not have been
represented in MAINTAINERS but that was what Sato-san agreed to when we all had
lunch together in tokyo however many years ago that was.)

> I’m seriously considering adopting the architecture.
> 
> Not sure whether Linus would grant that though.

I'll happily endorse you for maintainer if that would help.

Rob