Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:14:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:14:29 -0500 Received: from shell.cyberus.ca ([216.191.240.114]:25595 "EHLO shell.cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:14:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:10:41 -0500 (EST) From: jamal To: bert hubert cc: , , Subject: Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (almost!) In-Reply-To: <20011209023029.A25580@outpost.ds9a.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, bert hubert wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:14:10PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > AFAICT, the priomap maps skb->priority to band. So the translation is as > follows: > yes ;-> > > > > so do prio and pfifo_fast (as i am sure you are aware) > > Of course, but only CBQ (& HTB, by the way) can extract a classid directly > from it, without a priomap. Devik is planning to learn HTB to extract a > classid directly from the fwmark, to skip a layer of indirection. > I am not sure if this is such a nice hack. Whats wrong with with using the fwmark classifier to select classes? cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/