Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <39b55b55-b0fd-95fc-5f68-e00cd20f076d@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 15 Jan 2023 15:45:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: sram: Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Tanmay Shah <tanmays@amd.com>, Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230113073045.4008853-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
 <df4fdecb-6ca7-d96b-bcad-02cefb52ce4e@linaro.org>
 <e675a037-3c07-a8bb-19d4-781ab881c920@amd.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <e675a037-3c07-a8bb-19d4-781ab881c920@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 13/01/2023 19:04, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof Thanks for your reviews.
> 
> Please find my comments below.
> 
> On 1/12/23 11:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/01/2023 08:30, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>> This patch introduces bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx
>>> platforms. As of now TCM addresses are hardcoded in xilinx remoteproc
>>> driver. This bindings will help in defining TCM in device-tree and
>>> make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven from the driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/sram/xlnx,tcm.yaml    | 137 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/xlnx,tcm.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/xlnx,tcm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/xlnx,tcm.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..02d17026fb1f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/xlnx,tcm.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sram/xlnx,tcm.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM)
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> +  Tightly Coupled Memory(TCM) is available on AMD-Xilinx paltforms for ARM
>>> +  cortex remote processors to use. It is low-latency memory that provide
>>> +  predictable instruction execution and predictable data load/store timing.
>>> +  TCM can be configured in lockstep mode or split mode. In split mode
>>> +  configuration each RPU core has its own set of ATCM and BTCM memories and in
>>> +  lockstep mode redundant processor's TCM become available to lockstep
>>> +  processor. So In lockstep mode ATCM and BTCM size is increased.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  $nodename:
>>> +    pattern: "sram-[0-9a-f]+$"
>> Drop node name requirement.
>> Why do you need sram node at all?
> 
> 
> I will remove sram- node. However, it device-tree I was planning to put
> 
> all TCM nodes under single node for example:
> 
> tcm {
> 
>      tcm-lockstep {
> 
>      };
> 
>      tcm-core@0 {

Mix of nodes with and without unit address is pointing to some design
issues.

> 
>      };
> 
> };
> 
> The top-most tcm node I assumed sram node. So I kept sram@xxxx
> 
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  "^tcm-[a-z]+@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      During the split mode, each RPU core has its own set of ATCM and BTCM memory
>>> +
>>> +      During the lock-step operation, the TCMs that are associated with the
>>> +      redundant processor become available to the lock-step processor.
>>> +      For example if each individual processor has 64KB ATCM, then in lockstep mode
>>> +      The size of ATCM become 128KB. Same for BTCM. tcm-lockstep node represents
>>> +      TCM address space in lockstep mode. tcm-core@x node specfies each core's
>>> +      TCM address space in split mode.
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        oneOf:
>> This is not oneOf.
>>
>>> +          - items:
>> and you do not have more than one item.
>>
>>> +              - enum:
>>> +                  - xlnx,tcm-lockstep
>>> +                  - xlnx,tcm-split
>> compatible describes hardware, not configuration. What you encode here
>> does not fit compatible.
> 
> 
> I see. So, only xlnx,tcm is enough.

No, it must be specific to SoC.

> 
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +      "#address-cells":
>> Use consistent quotes, either " or '
> 
> 
> Ack.
> 
> 
>>
>>> +        const: 1
>>> +
>>> +      "#size-cells":
>>> +        const: 1
>>> +
>>> +      reg:
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - description: |
>>> +              ATCM Memory address space. An ATCM typically holds interrupt or
>>> +              exception code that must be accessed at high speed, without any
>>> +              potential delay resulting from a cache miss.
>>> +              RPU on AMD-Xilinx platform can also fetch data from ATCM
>>> +          - description: |
>>> +              BTCM Memory address space. A BTCM typically holds a block of data
>>> +              for intensive processing, such as audio or video processing. RPU on
>>> +              AMD-Xilinx Platforms can also fetch Code (Instructions) from BTCM
>>> +
>>> +      reg-names:
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - const: atcm
>>> +          - const: btcm
>>> +
>>> +      ranges: true
>>> +
>>> +      power-domains:
>>> +        maxItems: 8
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - description: list of ATCM Power domains
>>> +          - description: list of BTCM Power domains
>>> +        additionalItems: true
>> And what are the rest?
> As both items are list, we should be able to include more than one 
> power-domain I believe.
> 
> 
> So first item I am trying to create list of ATCM power domains.
> 
> In split mode, first item is ATCM power-domain and second item is BTCM 
> power domain.
> 
> However, In lockstep mode, second core's TCM physically relocates and 
> two ATCM combines and

Why power domains of a device depend on the mode? This does not look
like binding describing hardware.

> 
> makes single region of ATCM. However, their power-domains remains same.
> 
> So, In lockstep mode, first two banks are ATCM and so, first two items 
> are ATCM power-domains.
> 
> I am not sure best way to represent this. But, first itmes is list.
> 
> So, I am assuming list of all ATCM power-domains possible.

List all items. Order is fixed, you cannot say BTCM is second item and
then put here something else.

Best regards,
Krzysztof