Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <371094e6-b805-6e0b-1f03-fb3a113bcb12@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 15 Jan 2023 09:25:55 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Add callbacks to mitigate
 wakeups due to contaminant
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Kyle Tso <kyletso@google.com>
References: <20230114093246.1933321-1-badhri@google.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <20230114093246.1933321-1-badhri@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/14/23 01:32, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> On some of the TCPC implementations, when the Type-C port is exposed
> to contaminants, such as water, TCPC stops toggling while reporting OPEN
> either by the time TCPM reads CC pin status or during CC debounce
> window. This causes TCPM to be stuck in TOGGLING state. If TCPM is made
> to restart toggling, the behavior recurs causing redundant CPU wakeups
> till the USB-C port is free of contaminant.
> 
> [206199.287817] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [206199.640337] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [206199.985789] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> 
> (or)
> 
> [ 7853.867577] Start toggling
> [ 7853.889921] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 7855.698765] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 5 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
> [ 7855.698790] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7855.698826] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 170 ms [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7855.703559] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 5 -> 5 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT, polarity 0, connected]
> [ 7855.856555] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 5 -> 0 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 7855.856581] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7855.856613] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED @ 170 ms [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7856.027744] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED [delayed 170 ms]
> [ 7856.181949] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 7856.187896] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 7857.645630] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 0 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 7857.647291] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 5 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
> [ 7857.647298] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7857.647310] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 170 ms [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7857.808106] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 5 -> 0 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT, polarity 0, disconnected]
> [ 7857.808123] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7857.808150] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED @ 170 ms [rev3 NONE_AMS]
> [ 7857.978727] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED [delayed 170 ms]
> 
> To mitigate redundant TCPM wakeups, TCPCs which do have the needed hardware
> can implement the check_contaminant callback which is invoked by TCPM
> to evaluate for presence of contaminant. Lower level TCPC driver can
> restart toggling through TCPM_PORT_CLEAN event when the driver detects
> that USB-C port is free of contaminant. check_contaminant callback also
> passes the disconnect_while_debounce flag which when true denotes that
> the CC pins transitioned to OPEN state during the CC debounce window.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com>
> ---
> Changes since v12:
> * None.
> Changes since v11:
> * None.

Why did you drop the Reviewed-by: tags if there was no change ?

Same question applied to the second patch of the series.

Guenter