Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp2580224rwb; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:25:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsnl5IFm4wjcU3nlWYQZv+cDbrgVr2gqX/SJlCsu/VG5acKtKpNGFjah7g+IKG2o7SnCiqu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:241b:b0:45c:b772:5f41 with SMTP id t27-20020a056402241b00b0045cb7725f41mr87437875eda.6.1673835918085; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:25:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673835918; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0/Ba3gfhJIPpAGZ/foNTKTcYBeczQSmEO+UltG9+E45Ug7LiEGy4zeM9Dm/Z7Ha46Q 4EYML7XEMaMeeC0g6rKMmaVf/kpj/ynKXf9JXaBQw49rgOrs3WFsoustGSbmebbVCYJo xPGVqcqVx6/a6bgIAlle3ev9+1sy8BVibrRtHYhi2oJH/U9Jhc6XN4dvgS0pZh0uTkqj 7BZc4YeeOEAms8p3UCHna9HmSRkNUCcldITNRiNhHlU9nmyDFkzZRunnQy44WQWl23AS aHw1GjnwiuRXBbqNlrHZdFHR7O4Xa7GzXqnokYXNaOU3pnNVPdq1HAskRvKrQvgLx1cC rSlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=nLc3av5/Waqbjx0bV9LbeX3QPGlA5GYodZ5Et8UcGAA=; b=Md+tvHjo+w0wttY/J6HDBGO15dSLJDGXpHTDe9gkrjHgwo+0CKoVb8Gq5/g4vE6un3 19Hjlh7r4+HZ3DdbmTJibb/7uj7z7Vy7fsvj5qzomNmMLbXnKkKtcowCXJbWdd2Jx+8R aE0fNjPSIxS4KkJsN3gQxbELdvF1Uc1XpbhS/wtZ0xdo5xgcDBh5cUd7n8DKzIb7B8f3 sF14ka7tNvdh/t+MBSI6ghmObTOmSCYeHsoS2VcTam+xiRwmX6BD6II+7tWjfRiHga8A mSJPoaQsqoo4j0L//Umsls+eA9XsLm3VAbWd/KHFr47tLX5DlMVxlP/hX35A/UZq/wmw a8WQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4-20020a50aac4000000b0048b4e2aaba9si28219225edc.98.2023.01.15.18.25.05; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:25:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231819AbjAPByG (ORCPT + 52 others); Sun, 15 Jan 2023 20:54:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34896 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231531AbjAPBxa (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2023 20:53:30 -0500 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3261544B9; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.169]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NwFRN5dpGz4f3v7h; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:53:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgD3rbERrsRj9iw3Bw--.37368S3; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:53:23 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: jack@suse.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, paolo.valente@linaro.org, axboe@kernel.dk Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:51:46 +0800 Message-Id: <20230116095153.3810101-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230116095153.3810101-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230116095153.3810101-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgD3rbERrsRj9iw3Bw--.37368S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uF4xCr1xXrWruF18AF45trb_yoW8ZF17pa y7Ka47u348JF1ruFyjq3WfZFyYqan5CrnrtF13G34Fqr97ur92gasFg3y5Xa1ftFZ3Aw4j v3WUWa4q9F15CaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB0b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGwA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK 0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4 x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l 84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I 8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AK xVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUsgyZUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Function bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection may temporarily raise inject limit to one request if current inject_limit is 0 before search of the source queue for injection. However the search below will reset inject limit to bfqd->in_service_queue which is zero for raised inject limit. Then the temporarily raised inject limit never works as expected. Assigment limit to bfqd->in_service_queue in search is needed as limit maybe overwriten to min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for condition that a large in-flight request is on non-rotational devices in found queue. So we need to reset limit to bfqd->in_service_queue for normal case. Actually, we have already make sure bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit before search, then -Limit is >= 1 as bfqd->rq_in_driver is >= 0. Then min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) is always 1. So we can simply check bfqd->rq_in_driver with 1 instead of result of min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for larget request in non-rotational device case to avoid overwritting limit and the bug is gone. -For normal case, we have already check bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit, so we can return found bfqq unconditionally to remove unncessary check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 815b884d6c5a..8836221a2673 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -4730,12 +4730,10 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd) */ if (blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue) && blk_rq_sectors(bfqq->next_rq) >= - BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT) - limit = min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit); - else - limit = in_serv_bfqq->inject_limit; - - if (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver < limit) { + BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT && + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver >= 1) + continue; + else { bfqd->rqs_injected = true; return bfqq; } -- 2.30.0