Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp3584630rwb; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:53:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXstEh/qTCd5EN9vIXAFx3qsAESuFf6RoAR2xzEFUCEfU0eFceHEbvCcW45sJSYCGIfjdM7i X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d48e:b0:870:58ae:842e with SMTP id vj14-20020a170907d48e00b0087058ae842emr5596880ejc.24.1673891632256; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:53:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673891632; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kRvIMj/mh3Vm+V+DFF2z40r06r/nuj/BBC2Ty3kjQn+hnB4swm825JFG9He3WGp60e glGPYIkoDblDhmYAwA5sDg43vgFua6gRpRzR5NWFd9kHot+3waNn4QyRbS/GGsX6vPje em/b63o2aU/iX+MKvA/i7UwgtmYvP6gXQnnEFqeB7hcf14ROMRbk1nlytkPvUWexkKd0 d4scYG1jSdfAcDUS+hBvB+gfNkktyhCca6GY5jbcRi4L4eEJ4bGKDOr65SaNEJfoP5HN 17rZsDMOXnc0QR43FJhmipUzRpE5pVNInbevhusQR7AVLizwWLlxb7hRjyhjQtSoPfCh 8z1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=LzyAhUKx02vsHse/bj4NXPoBji03hcAvZwNWSPzAssE=; b=HsHqCNCGO5iEB2e8tfEr5N7DIODA6F/MtCWi/Nh0bcX3JAVikDaUHtllz2TfOcIQPF kBwIOxt2E8qKR+4pRCiP18k1KjxJWScs9Ylhmkx6zQko+ouxamGfVy/IAlPX2+ZSIhIZ ciRp1mKEAH3Fp4E3VKDx8fZMvwsyy6YUpPruwzFBmjdOCkxXqbUeWNUU7tP0utzUj6ui dIa+E/LkWNqrdkl5/85HTE3Luy6xZmLlnMo5X9b8xYpdn3Ayc3izOTBmBZpuMJURiN5q VwivKJ08qT4VxEV+CU2PdTrPiomX/6PNupM/OwPYlSfM5nWjhIzSa88OjDoHPTGeYPgG IR3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=UkWrXvDy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v15-20020a17090606cf00b0086a76383bd5si9923040ejb.650.2023.01.16.09.53.39; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=UkWrXvDy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233571AbjAPRDv (ORCPT + 52 others); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:03:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57274 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232635AbjAPRDR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:03:17 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CC72F7BD for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 08:45:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id g23so15267404plq.12 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 08:45:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LzyAhUKx02vsHse/bj4NXPoBji03hcAvZwNWSPzAssE=; b=UkWrXvDyc0cUkxpAlH9rI8+XFykmRKW7wp/w2dlGz5MwCiHza3yS8mCK8rn+4+ik7P BiwVt+UW+GtQQ77q/Y333Ged6OvdSffMFYXzu1cyNEkPcCz9cwbQ2GSsIeFz9GmAwbSJ WN9tAtzAmyCPXp8zvEaYbHEK+AC/YA9UeXIytjnjMcGYt0JJ8u/gAs2/5z9kbrUdIvQ6 BKPzlJpwVH42ZRuY6RuZZ18VSFIz5ghVbiAACCCmUJLwktJ7qD2ellthVZV3VUUxzgq6 OHzXOjOVXZbS4RaqZj+HkDZpWizr0ZI+ZatCHhobnr+NBbOzJbwbLvVa/i/lDtu+1MWn MKjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LzyAhUKx02vsHse/bj4NXPoBji03hcAvZwNWSPzAssE=; b=LJLrrx3858kwsBKYtPES7vwg4vZtQ3oNbBdG6gx/MopDmgxgs5ORBu/AHm7rdlg8xj MLGZgvUWPxHaQX7DJedYUT26uFdhUZFWPqgIqiNcCug6CLyhz1JTRkyHGzoh3oBSlUTh N4+Baxu60Ymw6qdvXYh7nYP8mfjsPdH7ziBRfbUr4luSraCqU5bmkELeDUGrcCadL51Q Qp3Y9Y/xBq50MqFyRtVpxnXkwzeZyAWFnudQ2SkhYPEjjDIDuiGqGLhKxiWEEd13ZlAQ HbCpVXoHCKHIi3rJOpZTED7AklM3kjUYRPPOrfUAq/VwJCqyarpmeG4eFgM7j4XK4Tap OacA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krgAJ5bRRkf1uQjP+LzRunXsLrrYrBwgXeeF/sed1g1SgWIEmBi OEmghP91WcFolfxEmjOHPZFnDg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:ce4d:b0:b8:71b7:b903 with SMTP id id13-20020a056a20ce4d00b000b871b7b903mr5854407pzb.31.1673887530242; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 08:45:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from p14s ([2604:3d09:148c:c800:32ab:eb7f:cea:1014]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i15-20020aa796ef000000b0058d9623e7f1sm2944640pfq.73.2023.01.16.08.45.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 08:45:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:45:27 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Devarsh Thakkar Cc: andersson@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, s-anna@ti.com, hnagalla@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com, nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com, a-bhatia1@ti.com, j-luthra@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use separate compatible string for TI AM62x SoC family Message-ID: <20230116164527.GB3239767@p14s> References: <20230116151906.549384-1-devarsht@ti.com> <20230116151906.549384-4-devarsht@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230116151906.549384-4-devarsht@ti.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:49:06PM +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote: > AM62 and AM62A SoCs use single core R5F which is a new scenario > different than the one being used with CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU > which is for utilizing a single core from a set of cores available > in R5F cluster present in the SoC. > > To support this single core scenario map it with > newly defined CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE and use it when > compatible is set to ti,am62-r5fss. > > Also set PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE config for > CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE too as it is required by R5 core when it > is being as general purpose core instead of device manager. > > Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar > --- > V2: > - Fix indentation and ordering issues as per review comments > V3: > - Change CLUSTER_MODE_NONE value to -1 > V4: > - No change > V5: > - No change (fixing typo in email address) > V6: > - Use CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE for AM62x > - Set PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE for single core. > --- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > index 036c9dc217f3..089215144e6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > @@ -71,14 +71,16 @@ struct k3_r5_mem { > /* > * All cluster mode values are not applicable on all SoCs. The following > * are the modes supported on various SoCs: > - * Split mode : AM65x, J721E, J7200 and AM64x SoCs > - * LockStep mode : AM65x, J721E and J7200 SoCs > - * Single-CPU mode : AM64x SoCs only > + * Split mode : AM65x, J721E, J7200 and AM64x SoCs > + * LockStep mode : AM65x, J721E and J7200 SoCs > + * Single-CPU mode : AM64x SoCs only > + * Single-Core mode : AM62x, AM62A SoCs > */ > enum cluster_mode { > CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT = 0, > CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP, > CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU, > + CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE > }; > > /** > @@ -86,11 +88,13 @@ enum cluster_mode { > * @tcm_is_double: flag to denote the larger unified TCMs in certain modes > * @tcm_ecc_autoinit: flag to denote the auto-initialization of TCMs for ECC > * @single_cpu_mode: flag to denote if SoC/IP supports Single-CPU mode > + * @is_single_core: flag to denote if SoC/IP has only single core R5 > */ > struct k3_r5_soc_data { > bool tcm_is_double; > bool tcm_ecc_autoinit; > bool single_cpu_mode; > + bool is_single_core; > }; > > /** > @@ -838,7 +842,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) > > core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); > if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || > - cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) { > + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || > + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE) { > core = core0; > } else { > core = kproc->core; > @@ -881,7 +886,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) > * with the bit configured, so program it only on > * permitted cores > */ > - if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) { > + if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || > + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE) { > set_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE; Why was this not part of the 5 previous version? > } else { > /* > @@ -1073,6 +1079,7 @@ static void k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) > > if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || > cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || > + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE || > !cluster->soc_data->tcm_is_double) > return; > > @@ -1146,7 +1153,9 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) > atcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN ? 1 : 0; > btcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN ? 1 : 0; > loczrama = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE ? 1 : 0; > - if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) { > + if (cluster->soc_data->is_single_core) { > + mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE; > + } else if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) { I have already commented on that. > mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE ? > CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; > } else { > @@ -1268,9 +1277,12 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err_add; > } > > - /* create only one rproc in lockstep mode or single-cpu mode */ > + /* create only one rproc in lockstep, single-cpu or > + * single core mode > + */ > if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || > - cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) > + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU || > + cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE) > break; > } > > @@ -1699,12 +1711,19 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > > cluster->dev = dev; > + > /* > - * default to most common efuse configurations - Split-mode on AM64x > - * and LockStep-mode on all others > + * default to most common efuse configurations - > + * Split-mode on AM64x > + * Single core on AM62x > + * LockStep-mode on all others > */ > - cluster->mode = data->single_cpu_mode ? > + if (!data->is_single_core) > + cluster->mode = data->single_cpu_mode ? > CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT : CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP; > + else > + cluster->mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE; > + > cluster->soc_data = data; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cluster->cores); > > @@ -1716,8 +1735,14 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > num_cores = of_get_available_child_count(np); > - if (num_cores != 2) { > - dev_err(dev, "MCU cluster requires both R5F cores to be enabled, num_cores = %d\n", > + if (num_cores != 2 && !data->is_single_core) { > + dev_err(dev, "MCU cluster requires both R5F cores to be enabled but num_cores is set to = %d\n", > + num_cores); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + if (num_cores != 1 && data->is_single_core) { > + dev_err(dev, "SoC supports only single core R5 but num_cores is set to %d\n", > num_cores); > return -ENODEV; > } > @@ -1759,18 +1784,28 @@ static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am65_j721e_soc_data = { > .tcm_is_double = false, > .tcm_ecc_autoinit = false, > .single_cpu_mode = false, > + .is_single_core = false, > }; > > static const struct k3_r5_soc_data j7200_j721s2_soc_data = { > .tcm_is_double = true, > .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true, > .single_cpu_mode = false, > + .is_single_core = false, > }; > > static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am64_soc_data = { > .tcm_is_double = true, > .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true, > .single_cpu_mode = true, > + .is_single_core = false, > +}; > + > +static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am62_soc_data = { > + .tcm_is_double = false, > + .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true, > + .single_cpu_mode = false, > + .is_single_core = true, > }; > > static const struct of_device_id k3_r5_of_match[] = { > @@ -1778,6 +1813,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id k3_r5_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "ti,j721e-r5fss", .data = &am65_j721e_soc_data, }, > { .compatible = "ti,j7200-r5fss", .data = &j7200_j721s2_soc_data, }, > { .compatible = "ti,am64-r5fss", .data = &am64_soc_data, }, > + { .compatible = "ti,am62-r5fss", .data = &am62_soc_data, }, > { .compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5fss", .data = &j7200_j721s2_soc_data, }, > { /* sentinel */ }, > }; > -- > 2.34.1 >