Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:34:30 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Cc:     Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] btrfs: Fix spelling mistake "geneartion" ->
 "generation"
Message-ID: <20230116183430.GX11562@twin.jikos.cz>
Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz
References: <20230116093847.26275-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230116093847.26275-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 09:38:47AM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in a btrfs warning message and in a comment.
> Fix them both.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c        | 2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index 10c26bc8e60e..a5d026041be4 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ static int scrub_checksum_tree_block(struct scrub_block *sblock)
>  		sblock->header_error = 1;
>  		sblock->generation_error = 1;
>  		btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
> -		"tree block %llu mirror %u has bad geneartion, has %llu want %llu",
> +		"tree block %llu mirror %u has bad generation, has %llu want %llu",

Folded to the patch, thanks.

>  			      sblock->logical, sblock->mirror_num,
>  			      btrfs_stack_header_generation(h),
>  			      sector->generation);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> index baad1ed7e111..32cd06f7660e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static int check_root_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
>  	/*
>  	 * For legacy root item, the members starting at generation_v2 will be
>  	 * all filled with 0.
> -	 * And since we allow geneartion_v2 as 0, it will still pass the check.
> +	 * And since we allow generation_v2 as 0, it will still pass the check.

This has been there for some time and codespell does not catch it,
probably due to "_v2".

What else I found in current misc-next:

./raid56.c:1001: numer ==> number
./raid56.c:1186: veritical ==> vertical
./raid56.c:1360: Uptodate ==> Up-to-date
./raid56.c:1524: behaviro ==> behavior
./raid56.c:1768: veritical ==> vertical
./raid56.h:68: Numer ==> Number
./raid56.h:135: exlcuding ==> excluding
./extent-io-tree.c:1628: Searche ==> Search, searched
./super.c:2053: goup ==> group
./volumes.c:730: constitutent ==> constituent
./bio.c:286: sychronously ==> synchronously
./compression.c:799: priting ==> printing
./compression.c:1645: uncompressible ==> incompressible
./compression.c:1645: uncompressible ==> incompressible
./disk-io.c:770: Retrun ==> Return
./disk-io.c:771: succesfuly ==> successfully
./scrub.c:232: archtectures ==> architectures

I'd rather apply one patch for all the typo fixes, can you do that
please? The above is only from codespell I haven't looked if the
suggestions are actually correct. Thanks.