Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:48:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:48:49 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:19858 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:48:44 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 21:48:37 -0700 Message-Id: <200112090448.fB94mbP05763@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Roman Zippel Cc: Rene Rebe , , Subject: Re: devfs unable to handle permission: 2.4.17-pre[4,5] /ALSA-0.9.0beta[9,10] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <200112090308.fB938N504764@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roman Zippel writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > > devfs_mk_dir returns an error now, so the driver won't be able to > > > make new dev nodes available. So far it was legal to manually create > > > a directory under devfs, now it's suddenly an error. > > > > It was always an error, you just got away with it. > > Sorry, but this is bullshit. You even included an example script > with this "error" (Documentation/filesystems/devfs/rc.devfs). You > suddenly change the behaviour of devfs during a stable release in a > noncompatible way. Distributions and their users that followed > _your_ advice are suddenly fucked up, that's irresponsible. How do > you think devfs should be ever taken seriously? Oh, the "tar kludge". That script has been obsolete for over a year and a half. I should have removed it ages ago. I really should get around to doing that one day. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/