Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp4532906rwb; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 02:01:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvlKMEVaqBhWlmHzJGNmcl5w1m/qbV22aV1PfBiDyyz1CjICoz333FXNXox8lxP+FTaqiOZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1b0b:b0:229:5029:f47 with SMTP id q11-20020a17090a1b0b00b0022950290f47mr2432526pjq.47.1673949690758; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 02:01:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673949690; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PVyomExGQsLeN8nPTuoP2NRBXAog1V5MdFZWo78yuiTnHfJezrkZMvqpaounwGeijv UbrbYFwhv/FXHf8SJzvZg9eYuaWMl/ZVbFJJBbM5ppv72HM6Kqfd54VcJHI7K/Rhg3HD wAKN7guzfho646NKS5oDZP8UVtRJaxPeppkHSs4R0LouaZsc/PkRV3gz3LubDqdmZg61 72ApYaQ6t6krk3IvTqhdnFZh6ZsRaBknr0RYoDk6X6FbFND8EKaA9xVJHNcPSheUV4H/ AMlyFPC4MkRQJ5z1xHaTjMv3BEGdBEj5Nd950NIqCLZleQI5PlxQFDC/X428/du84WlF tw7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=jn2DB03+zQz9YkRWZcTUuqN6EwsjvQ9H80/PTg1Q3xc=; b=DKqeEOLa87PBZW7u1rjdmuILNu4ztonS6Ord7jfH3VkoqLQUzpt7+epFr5iqOFzHjh TyG03/otCtdiw5CFHR71MfDsXLcfjx3o5daVQS/TMJx5FIbeG93uESbyTDCqv+/F9xRE LEHAZRD60xXdgVBHZuu4Vwr3cAfRQsX3o4uy3Mie6LSaxYr737Gk0sWTFittM837QtJJ 5yFY8oFU3BrgwYBp4n/jL7zEXald/+9NOjpeCyKs1B53LJG9AUI2Pc6EcaH8J4syAxSb 1hAWOf7xSFXyscSRhwK0O0d5GY9O7Nfr3AHxfP5OXeZsr74HmnsypujjX0LSQV9K0z3B xY7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=mt43Ik9D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b9-20020a63cf49000000b004a7a73eb62esi31928254pgj.100.2023.01.17.02.01.24; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 02:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=mt43Ik9D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235975AbjAQJal (ORCPT + 49 others); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:30:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34270 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236598AbjAQJaS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:30:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2D02F79B; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id tz11so9504776ejc.0; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:28:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jn2DB03+zQz9YkRWZcTUuqN6EwsjvQ9H80/PTg1Q3xc=; b=mt43Ik9DaqYec+BGI5vs1pyXnQg1sn6Pa6JrQt5XGWgbzaY0xaTaPqi43HjuYXUFbm wPvl/+ibsbxMl91qcC0hfXrZbgtCFQMo/sekdOJmELK7xalN6dAIU1KbP7MXjnzcD6p/ f0OANhmUWZdPwGgQD/51SsfOT3/kZr0JFPfROlAxXUvwBf/Pg3CGcKalJRUtls4Tuw7p /Up6enmv9yjrgDWk7mKr4IHBxHQO5zxyKprVPwFFbi8W8c9sOwVJYdJgKVjdYPlAMVm+ DYHPMklo3CJCV0KeQMnWfEdjFErTgBr6Zq01pk9l9d0W2N9GFLKwDCqGhZlARP5VfohM Aolg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jn2DB03+zQz9YkRWZcTUuqN6EwsjvQ9H80/PTg1Q3xc=; b=tiBNub6pPQx9g/K12azvKFji8ZABDPVUq45UI4RvIaTdrEVDGvvkOgwv1lP1m+N2uM 4w36GO+EbzasJmoQQltSsZEya1ElMu1aDq6FE1suEosf12CfsiR1xtvGewBuLbkbbFcT sAacKlXmKlDo+HvUtPN5IY56J4e5dJUfoQyrUdr5yGurk5K+HuuFJZaOby5nx//5Cro1 77gduYrFfgZUrE82iPH5ueSK0UmFw4td/T8tgO3A2rJz/yjsIQQQYsGSAB+nawOFBQWy XKZp92F2sad71kNB1ViqZ55GLQwrEFErPU0uxWjw4LuWniNUbSV63G5EBQtQwQHzTOoF G+PQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krbGpU5LBR+OBkhVxllqwBGL6Xaj5GDF4UBwt/8ZJ5iSwYo10pV TLU813+pXmNEW0MVCES/j2X6B3pElQ+DhT0Y/vE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:86cc:b0:872:1ad9:460b with SMTP id j12-20020a17090686cc00b008721ad9460bmr143128ejy.152.1673947733463; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:28:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230116225343.26336-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <20230116225343.26336-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> From: Daniel Baluta Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor To: "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , "S.J. Wang" , Fabio Estevam , Daniel Baluta , SOF-Team , Mpuaudiosw , Iuliana Prodan , linux-imx , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:21 AM Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote: > > From: Iuliana Prodan > > There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world" > application on the DSP and we don't have IPC between the cores. > Therefore, skip the wait for remote processor to start. > > Added "ignoreready" flag while inserting the module to ignore > remote processor reply after start. > By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc. I think that ignore_dsp_ready would be a clearer name flag.