Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 16:09:02 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, michel@lespinasse.org,
        jglisse@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        mgorman@techsingularity.net, dave@stgolabs.net,
        willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        ldufour@linux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com,
        paulmck@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
        peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
        hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
        punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, lstoakes@gmail.com,
        peterjung1337@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
        axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com, minchan@google.com,
        jannh@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, tatashin@google.com,
        edumazet@google.com, gthelen@google.com, gurua@google.com,
        arjunroy@google.com, soheil@google.com, hughlynch@google.com,
        leewalsh@google.com, posk@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] mm: introduce vma->vm_flags modifier functions
Message-ID: <Y8a6DhA6o3jcZaM3@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20230109205336.3665937-1-surenb@google.com>
 <20230109205336.3665937-14-surenb@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230109205336.3665937-14-surenb@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:08, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> To keep vma locking correctness when vm_flags are modified, add modifier
> functions to be used whenever flags are updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h       | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm_types.h |  8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index ec2c4c227d51..35cf0a6cbcc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -702,6 +702,44 @@ static inline void vma_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	vma_init_lock(vma);
>  }
>  
> +/* Use when VMA is not part of the VMA tree and needs no locking */
> +static inline
> +void init_vm_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, flags);
> +}

Why do we need WRITE_ONCE here? Isn't vma invisible during its
initialization?

> +
> +/* Use when VMA is part of the VMA tree and needs appropriate locking */
> +static inline
> +void reset_vm_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	vma_write_lock(vma);
> +	init_vm_flags(vma, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +void set_vm_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	vma_write_lock(vma);
> +	vma->vm_flags |= flags;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +void clear_vm_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	vma_write_lock(vma);
> +	vma->vm_flags &= ~flags;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +void mod_vm_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +		  unsigned long set, unsigned long clear)
> +{
> +	vma_write_lock(vma);
> +	vma->vm_flags |= set;
> +	vma->vm_flags &= ~clear;
> +}
> +

This is rather unusual pattern. There is no note about locking involved
in the naming and also why is the locking part of this interface in the
first place? I can see reason for access functions to actually check for
lock asserts.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs