Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 16:42:21 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, michel@lespinasse.org,
        jglisse@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        mgorman@techsingularity.net, dave@stgolabs.net,
        willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        ldufour@linux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com,
        paulmck@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
        peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
        hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
        punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, lstoakes@gmail.com,
        peterjung1337@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
        axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com, minchan@google.com,
        jannh@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, tatashin@google.com,
        edumazet@google.com, gthelen@google.com, gurua@google.com,
        arjunroy@google.com, soheil@google.com, hughlynch@google.com,
        leewalsh@google.com, posk@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/41] kernel/fork: assert no VMA readers during its
 destruction
Message-ID: <Y8bB3TFLQV2HJZQ+@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20230109205336.3665937-1-surenb@google.com>
 <20230109205336.3665937-27-surenb@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230109205336.3665937-27-surenb@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:21, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Assert there are no holders of VMA lock for reading when it is about to be
> destroyed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 8 ++++++++
>  kernel/fork.c      | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 594e835bad9c..c464fc8a514c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -680,6 +680,13 @@ static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(vma->vm_lock_seq != READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq), vma);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void vma_assert_no_reader(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(rwsem_is_locked(&vma->lock) &&
> +		      vma->vm_lock_seq != READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq),
> +		      vma);

Do we really need to check for vm_lock_seq? rwsem_is_locked should tell
us something is wrong on its own, no? This could be somebody racing with
the vma destruction and using the write lock. Unlikely but I do not see
why to narrow debugging scope.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs