Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp5521622rwb; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:09:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtuTKt4+BUWmJJGr8tKLiQDheIe0orGou2oUP/rWUpBstMxEz3Y2AkvUCIcLT3GMBsph2+p X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a81:b0:190:d273:38a9 with SMTP id w1-20020a1709029a8100b00190d27338a9mr5014427plp.14.1673996951814; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:09:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1673996951; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=m6J3kJC97MNiHXbsyO5RIOrdVq3yYIKtYFSKvJHbdOVKjMoLrx0d5U8v2Dan26nX9x hJa9eaesXzhJTfWWSL/ViA3jZB2HUU2yL/FaqXkFIr5k4a3R5GiWjbTflmO2cwwYawYg Cu6qQaY08310ZX7iFDId0vuM2OscfR8XJQhmaEIm3LkMEVJ+oGzH890vdV2/Xv2oze3D xWBasNYM0gYqGP/7WtlMMs6jnUsTT2tFI+VgHXEaFOBroLgsg5uynnjxqLlcaUMt13AB I7g2ZbgjZZsQImfXRs65q61sIX8mFL1OGzs1FEMMZmmh7Wc1niCsl/ulFVnU4HPprs1J bbCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:mime-version:date:dkim-signature; bh=ULZLef51O7gy3vfZoZVDDimXgPQXe9qknUeKNZ9s4pw=; b=uQMUFkeNRuncmcntpciQsKAi9hXamgoCmBq5CGmbw3++GFUwh66ayhn0sdhNq3UEWv GnL4GnKiyR27pje2U/pf6HOU0UIWTGLGhFi9lsr9npWlSrRse4e8xCv/LS4Rm+ikXZGZ +00xOIVSvD/U6GiMWjbeU1DTGzgTpETyTqPNbyGYmdP/lCKCaHTQFiTvpE76ouGaM5IM TxMs/jvC+CW8M09HMX78YQVVTTEwYf2b722HTAeamvOcued9MNiXNesLl0Z4TWM6SEom dXmIGdEfpX8jDAVJ+aQxC5yuTq5GF6gweJf1twT3NkmEsCtgP73kjEZE0A4Tb5YVCn1Z ro/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=A7+73cH9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p1-20020a170902b08100b00176e58d4a4esi157771plr.100.2023.01.17.15.09.06; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:09:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=A7+73cH9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229989AbjAQWtU (ORCPT + 46 others); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:49:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46324 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230042AbjAQWrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:47:00 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A95E24901C for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:50:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-4ce566db73eso273057747b3.11 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:50:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ULZLef51O7gy3vfZoZVDDimXgPQXe9qknUeKNZ9s4pw=; b=A7+73cH9pLRt5aUzTfHuCReOyUryIJc8uZlQ+f09yKp2WRxxccaP+nZMY2ZQ3A8xXI 1ZX5cg4STGhBE5+t+J5tUNYQ4HpLjKDzIVpj7wIveCAGLdQCIJ6wqDsDpYZlLrTNJLHS GAnbiZppqBEUBH4XBoxpNeSxwpIv+ItTNc5wFN4/RDwGl07Naf9b4Jt5D1W4R06M1Kbj B4LZ30HGL4qOzHy3Q8lDzSYt5KXAu7RCLu3U9IgX/uOE4CSBAi+gE3YvUwWS/sxeY5j+ tzQyc4UQfn6wGtEn7AP2dY/GyAPx0RAXUmXdg5YMMVV7C6UNE9suohgUd0OKiFuEm+ew OCUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ULZLef51O7gy3vfZoZVDDimXgPQXe9qknUeKNZ9s4pw=; b=NZdVFjc4uS6nyj8RbblfyX8lKfQSZV8VsV3V7VunU5+dRMQFzk3p8CgSFwGOr1bOGl ll4U//2GGCffqvfNAxfCiRRHiAGHqZg4hp+lTxzjI/WPm4EWUctXiBATFsb7tVqIpp/G rE7c/maWOtAEJrkHgzomoGz4MftAPc2OtsSSG/ozoMVSKPt4Qzj0OzMzFESWb+NZvweq v/jYUnNb30rxmDwktOqE3zO7cORnBfum4hOIZePjclL3qupUTo6PpFtofnsx6LrjDc3s q1BkDaLY54Ix8mClw44rOy4VDWXO5HsMiQqTrlEVCXQXHhkqbgmNx8ljDiMuHZXCrFa5 2zuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krvjBJO3Y7Dy4HbDmmBDncJon4hiK+QSW/6zdS/25Y+MOD+7Jau nBELTbBoKhHH9T1uo4nHI+wJbfinHg== X-Received: from rmoar-specialist.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:2b:7d90:c0a8:45d3]) (user=rmoar job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:40ca:0:b0:7ae:2b0:d5c6 with SMTP id n193-20020a2540ca000000b007ae02b0d5c6mr545169yba.627.1673992254928; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:50:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:50:46 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog Message-ID: <20230117215046.3734066-1-rmoar@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2] lib/hashtable_test.c: add test for the hashtable structure From: Rae Moar To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com, dlatypov@google.com Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Rae Moar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add a KUnit test for the kernel hashtable implementation in include/linux/hashtable.h. Note that this version does not yet test each of the rcu alternative versions of functions. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar --- Changes since v1: - Change Kconfig.debug message to be more succinct. - Directly increment current element's visited field rather than looking up corresponding element. - Use KUNIT_EXPECT_=E2=80=A6 statements to check keys are within range rath= er than using if statements. - Change hash_for_each_possible test to check buckets using a hash_for_each method instead of calculating the bucket number using hash_min. Note: The check patch script is outputting open brace errors on lines 158, 192, 247 of lib/hashtable_test.c. However, I think these errors are a mistake as the format of the braces on those lines seems consistent with the Linux Kernel style guide. lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 ++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/hashtable_test.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 340 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/hashtable_test.c diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 881c3f84e88a..69b1452a3eeb 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -2496,6 +2496,19 @@ config LIST_KUNIT_TEST =20 If unsure, say N. =20 +config HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Hashtable structures" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds the hashtable KUnit test suite. + It tests the basic functionality of the API defined in + include/linux/hashtable.h. For more information on KUnit and + unit tests in general please refer to the KUnit documentation + in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. + config LINEAR_RANGES_TEST tristate "KUnit test for linear_ranges" depends on KUNIT diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 4d9461bfea42..5f8efbe8e97f 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) +=3D pldmfw/ CFLAGS_bitfield_kunit.o :=3D $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN) obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) +=3D bitfield_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) +=3D list-test.o +obj-$(CONFIG_HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST) +=3D hashtable_test.o obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) +=3D test_linear_ranges.o obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) +=3D test_bits.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) +=3D cmdline_kunit.o diff --git a/lib/hashtable_test.c b/lib/hashtable_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ab09b747d83d --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/hashtable_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,326 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for the Kernel Hashtable structures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + * Author: Rae Moar + */ +#include + +#include + +struct hashtable_test_entry { + int key; + int data; + struct hlist_node node; + int visited; +}; + +static void hashtable_test_hash_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Test the different ways of initialising a hashtable. */ + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash1, 3); + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hash2, 3); + + hash_init(hash1); + hash_init(hash2); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash2)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_empty(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash)); + + a.key =3D 1; + a.data =3D 13; + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + + /* Hashtable should no longer be empty. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, hash_empty(hash)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_hashed(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + a.key =3D 1; + a.data =3D 13; + b.key =3D 1; + b.data =3D 2; + + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&a.node)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&b.node)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_add(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x; + int bkt; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + a.key =3D 1; + a.data =3D 13; + a.visited =3D 0; + b.key =3D 2; + b.data =3D 10; + b.visited =3D 0; + + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) { + x->visited++; + if (x->key =3D=3D a.key) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, x->data, 13); + else if (x->key =3D=3D b.key) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, x->data, 10); + else + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + } + + /* Both entries should have been visited exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, a.visited, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_del(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + a.key =3D 1; + a.data =3D 13; + b.key =3D 2; + b.data =3D 10; + b.visited =3D 0; + + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + hash_del(&b.node); + hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, b.key) { + x->visited++; + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, x->key, b.key); + } + + /* The deleted entry should not have been visited. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 0); + + hash_del(&a.node); + + /* The hashtable should be empty. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i =3D 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key =3D i; + entries[i].data =3D i + 10; + entries[i].visited =3D 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + count =3D 0; + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) { + x->visited +=3D 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, x->key, 0); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, x->key, 3); + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + for (j =3D 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + struct hlist_node *tmp; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i =3D 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key =3D i; + entries[i].data =3D i + 10; + entries[i].visited =3D 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + count =3D 0; + hash_for_each_safe(hash, bkt, tmp, x, node) { + x->visited +=3D 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, x->key, 0); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, x->key, 3); + count++; + + /* Delete entry during loop. */ + hash_del(&x->node); + } + + /* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + for (j =3D 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x, *y; + int buckets[2]; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries with key =3D 0. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i =3D 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key =3D 0; + entries[i].data =3D i; + entries[i].visited =3D 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + /* Add an entry with key =3D 1. */ + entries[3].key =3D 1; + entries[3].data =3D 3; + entries[3].visited =3D 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key); + + count =3D 0; + hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, 0) { + x->visited +=3D 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, x->data, 0); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, x->data, 4); + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry with key =3D 0 exactly once. */ + for (j =3D 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); + + /* Save the buckets for the different keys. */ + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, y, node) { + if (y->key < 0 || y->key > 1) + KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE(test, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + buckets[y->key] =3D bkt; + } + + /* If entry with key =3D 1 is in the same bucket as the entries with + * key =3D 0, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three + * entries were visited. + */ + if (buckets[0] =3D=3D buckets[1]) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1); + } else { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 0); + } +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x, *y; + struct hlist_node *tmp; + int buckets[2]; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries with key =3D 0. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i =3D 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key =3D 0; + entries[i].data =3D i; + entries[i].visited =3D 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + /* Add an entry with key =3D 1. */ + entries[3].key =3D 1; + entries[3].data =3D 3; + entries[3].visited =3D 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key); + + count =3D 0; + hash_for_each_possible_safe(hash, x, tmp, node, 0) { + x->visited +=3D 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, x->data, 0); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, x->data, 4); + count++; + + /* Delete entry during loop. */ + hash_del(&x->node); + } + + /* Should have visited each entry with key =3D 0 exactly once. */ + for (j =3D 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); + + /* Save the buckets for the different keys. */ + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, y, node) { + if (y->key < 0 || y->key > 1) + KUNIT_ASSERT_FAILURE(test, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + buckets[y->key] =3D bkt; + } + + /* If entry with key =3D 1 is in the same bucket as the entries with + * key =3D 0, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three + * entries were visited. + */ + if (buckets[0] =3D=3D buckets[1]) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1); + } else { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 0); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case hashtable_test_cases[] =3D { + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_init), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_empty), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_hashed), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_add), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_del), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite hashtable_test_module =3D { + .name =3D "hashtable", + .test_cases =3D hashtable_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&hashtable_test_module); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); base-commit: 88603b6dc419445847923fcb7fe5080067a30f98 --=20 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog