Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934551AbXHXCe5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:34:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934029AbXHXCei (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:34:38 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244]:21369 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933878AbXHXCeg (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:34:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jEWwxviggV07HNIceb2EAqkVmJJUc/3qDOOGu9dZmujst0jt26+PHkBc0Ek2r2YMX3wBdr6DIst+S0i4gRGXaKAA3d1c/5J0X6OmLXg0ahqnc+n5IHtOj1UZg4//Ni2lQ7U0UkfFwFp1yCJE4Q4l6jvBx+zScE0gmQMS430Vc2I= Message-ID: <625fc13d0708231934q5b369b4fh1a5c83def0e56a0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:34:34 -0500 From: "Josh Boyer" To: "Andy Isaacson" Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections Cc: "James Bottomley" , "Matt Mackall" , "Matthew Wilcox" , "Matthew Garrett" , "Tech Board Discuss" , linux-kernel , ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org In-Reply-To: <20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1187796179.3410.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070822224400.GA17255@srcf.ucam.org> <20070823002618.GO9163@parisc-linux.org> <20070823003748.GR30556@waste.org> <20070823004209.GP9163@parisc-linux.org> <20070823011953.GS30556@waste.org> <1187832907.3410.141.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1134 Lines: 26 On 8/23/07, Andy Isaacson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources > > > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it > > > hardly seems worth the trouble for a once-a-year election. > > > > Exactly ... we want a process that's simple and transparent. We chose > > voting at the KS because almost all the attendees satisfy the "made > > significant contributions to Linux" requirement without us having to do > > anything or make any controversial determinations. Like Matt said, > > better suggestions are welcome. > > This is a dumb suggestion, but... > > How about one vote per git commit merged to linus' tree? > > Might be worthwhile to allocate votes for Acked-By and so on, as well. Because git only goes back to 2.6.12. josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/