Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762658AbXHXI00 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:26:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757527AbXHXI0T (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:26:19 -0400 Received: from mx12.go2.pl ([193.17.41.142]:56613 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756963AbXHXI0S (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:26:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:27:25 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Mariusz Kozlowski Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1: irq lock inversion dependency detected Message-ID: <20070824082725.GA2203@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708100906.07111.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1036 Lines: 31 On 10-08-2007 09:06, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > Hello, > > And the winner of today is ... > > > > ========================================================= > [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] > 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7 > --------------------------------------------------------- > runscript.sh/5843 just changed the state of lock: > (_xmit_ETHER){-+..}, at: [] dev_watchdog+0x17/0xcc > but this lock took another, soft-irq-unsafe lock in the past: > (&tp->lock){--..} > > and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. ... > Really no idea who to CC here ;) IMHO, this should be fixed by last changes to free_irq & request_irq. (Seems to be possible only with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ?) Otherwise I can be CC-ed - my pleasure! Cheers, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/