Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1765996AbXHXItd@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1765996AbXHXItd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:49:33 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765533AbXHXItM
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:49:12 -0400
Received: from mx12.go2.pl ([193.17.41.142]:34502 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1765505AbXHXItK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:49:10 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:50:18 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1: irq lock inversion dependency detected
Message-ID: <20070824085018.GA2778@ff.dom.local>
References: <200708100906.07111.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> <20070824082725.GA2203@ff.dom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070824082725.GA2203@ff.dom.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1232
Lines: 30

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 10:27:25AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 10-08-2007 09:06, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
...
> > =========================================================
> > [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > runscript.sh/5843 just changed the state of lock:
> >  (_xmit_ETHER){-+..}, at: [<c03cbe79>] dev_watchdog+0x17/0xcc
> > but this lock took another, soft-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
> >  (&tp->lock){--..}
> > 
> > and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
> ...
> > Really no idea who to CC here ;)
> 
> IMHO, this should be fixed by last changes to free_irq & request_irq.
> (Seems to be possible only with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ?) Otherwise I can
> be CC-ed - my pleasure!

OOPS! But, since it's about inversion - not state - there should be no
connection... Anyway if this returns currently (and if _SHIRQ only) I'm
interested.

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/