Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230118122003.132905-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <Y8fpg/WkR4OMrpOu@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <CAMuHMdUegruzCdP_+_qNuhVvFWp-_8zvdYw=v3kmt6zDU8=w5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y8f2elExwiwxK2n+@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y8f2elExwiwxK2n+@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:02:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXYsCN+evJB8idRFQ-v2B4bJ6vi+DSF=Zg6+QSiu+Op5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: renesas: vsp1: blacklist r8a7795 ES1.*
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Laurent,

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:39 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:21 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:20:02PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > The earliest revision of these SoC may hang when underrunning. Later
> > > > revisions have that fixed. Bail out when we detect a problematic
> > > > version.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > The BSP tries to work around the issue, yet this is neither upstreamable
> > > > nor are we sure the solution is complete. Because the early SoC revision
> > > > is hardly in use, we simply "document" the problem upstream.
> > >
> > > The workaround isn't upstreamable as-is, but I think it could be
> > > upstreamed after being cleaned up.
> > >
> > > Overall, how much support do we still have upstream for H3 ES1.x, and do
> > > we need to keep it ? H3 ES.1x is relatively old, does someone still rely
> > > on it ?
> >
> > I think the upstream support level for R-Car H3 ES1.x is about the same
> > as for H3 ES2.0.
>
> Question is, do we need to keep it ? :-) And if we do, instead of
> black-listing devices in the VSP driver, how about dropping them from
> r8a77950.dtsi ?

I prefer blacklisting in the driver, as dropping them from r8a77950.dtsi
wouldn't disable them when used with an older or out-of-tree DTB.

>  We already delete quite a lot of devices there.

... because they don't exist on H3 ES1.x.

> Note that without VSP support, you will get no display either, so the
> DU device (and the LVDS encoder) so also be deleted.

True...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds