Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758933AbXHXKrV (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:47:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755432AbXHXKrH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:47:07 -0400 Received: from web32613.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.240]:37615 "HELO web32613.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754375AbXHXKrG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:47:06 -0400 X-YMail-OSG: HlGCtOAVM1ks3wX4w5Zd0v36f1bpG3VGG17nJWDTNm7FMnnkCE54iMignq.A835KYWb9LlCpn7JB8l2iVD_zgYjZyw-- X-RocketYMMF: knobi.rm Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:47:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Knoblauch Reply-To: spamtrap@knobisoft.de Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v9 To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1187890919.6114.411.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <681242.83596.qm@web32613.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1688 Lines: 54 --- Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 08:59 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > --- Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 05:49 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > > > > > Peter, > > > > > > > > any chance to get a rollup against 2.6.22-stable? > > > > > > > > The 2.6.23 series may not be usable for me due to the > > > > nosharedcache changes for NFS (the new default will massively > > > > disturb the user-space automounter). > > > > > > I'll see what I can do, bit busy with other stuff atm, hopefully > > > after > > > the weekend. > > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > any progress on a version against 2.6.22.5? I have seen the very > > positive report from Jeffrey W. Baker and would really love to test > > your patch. But as I said, anything newer than 2.6.22.x might not > be an > > option due to the NFS changes. > > mindless port, seems to compile and boot on my test box ymmv. > > I think .5 should not present anything other than trivial rejects if > anything. But I'm not keeping -stable in my git remotes so I can't > say > for sure. Hi Peter, thanks a lot. It applies to 2.6.22.5 almost cleanly, with just one 8-line offset in readahead.c. I will report testing-results separately. Thanks Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/