Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp6838058rwb; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:59:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvGKIWSJNFQYVyDOe3eCtLrGMMbaJGRwksWHxZYU2k6ikJ06kEAWLsfEE4WrKhUlRxJKxJg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:25db:b0:877:6a03:9ad1 with SMTP id n27-20020a17090625db00b008776a039ad1mr418906ejb.7.1674064793243; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:59:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1674064793; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zZvbv3hMu9TAj+aJladyiJffi/hLAGWVmqcmtHklDKLz55/obqkLhOEjZve1q/qiwd j11h4rcrC0gZQkU1tjBa4pxW6N9+WDrm38WS47hTYh5NSaru5KdndsVz5kf3O4LxUNOD Yofndx0TKR5EyRf5iWZ37QTt2K+ahaz5b8vV7wmensjjdRHQB9tEQt1ueXiuONDAH7PH MRXFj44OnxUZNzpoJj4BruNxR39u45hqUNmpKQxJ2H0e2UGLhc5d/n4oRe+cW3XN5pCv Vs1nzpMZ3BTd72fAPsQTsj6G8hC8WdxiYcu5kTwUkazOyjV6bYdgqD9FwkSPO8FU/9BR IA1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=5juip3msIp89FdaXQg9vkW8N/kQarTuFWP9qRz1941Q=; b=e8+CW/vsj1K7BPfICqBKRPrOeHmWbXwSIjGdr1egzflXle6z7M0W0jNaN61Oo/0NZ6 0Vc5NNLi8DP4tLwC3EAN7AUgYufCL1Ot3WqLY1hVH8wS7CC7V7bnQQ6weszMxZl0LDK2 IrPmKl0s3dvtzW2R6tsMob3BgPhT3WpZgfdpBLkJa6tvI/tn+PbzGeLdC8QS2EzClKTk ffzyQqubX3hlfhrvzwOo8O/Tt9Nf05yuLdsWH3PcQqVd0hp8vIA4nKK0mage4oFQsyjn qGSjasSRmj7BEJUzZf62kpJD4q8rUsjS5WKLPhiEHJOQeV/6FEMyvyNoAvIqdOUOMDcw AkBQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id un2-20020a170907cb8200b0084cbf555299si28572617ejc.954.2023.01.18.09.59.41; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231285AbjARRnh (ORCPT + 45 others); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:43:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39644 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231266AbjARRmg (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:42:36 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F7048604; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:42:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 94DB467373; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 18:42:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 18:42:08 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kemeng Shi Cc: hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk, dwagner@suse.de, hare@suse.de, ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.garry@huawei.com, jack@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] blk-mq: remove set of bd->last when get driver tag for next request fails Message-ID: <20230118174208.GH12399@lst.de> References: <20230118093726.3939160-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <20230118093726.3939160-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230118093726.3939160-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 05:37:24PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > Commit 113285b473824 ("blk-mq: ensure that bd->last is always set > correctly") will set last if we failed to get driver tag for next > request to avoid flush miss as we break the list walk and will not > send the last request in the list which will be sent with last set > normally. > This code seems stale now becase the flush introduced is always > redundant as: > For case tag is really out, we will send a extra flush if we find > list is not empty after list walk. > For case some tag is freed before retry in blk_mq_prep_dispatch_rq for > next, then we can get a tag for next request in retry and flush notified > already is not necessary. I think Ming will know this code better than me, but aren't we losing the blk_mq_get_driver_tag call entirely here now. Where is getting the driver tag covered now?