Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:51:55 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Cc:     Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
        Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Add WQ_SCHED_FIFO
Message-ID: <Y8gxu7l8BUWewuMg@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20230113210703.62107-1-nhuck@google.com>
 <Y8HI+42TxxlJxT6D@slm.duckdns.org>
 <CAJkfWY7vmvrU8sW3OWpSa9zygY=6e8BTTkktPe-VScdOcLL-sw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJkfWY7vmvrU8sW3OWpSa9zygY=6e8BTTkktPe-VScdOcLL-sw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 01:00:00PM -0800, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> This sounds fine to me. How do you feel about a config flag to change
> the default WQ_HIGHPRI scheduler policy and a sysfs node to update the
> policy per workqueue?

Yeah, sounds fine to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun