Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 07:47:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 07:47:01 -0500 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:45319 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 07:46:56 -0500 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:46:13 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Niels Christiansen Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Message-ID: <20011209114613.GA5063@krispykreme> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > | > ...which may be true for 4-ways and even 8-ways but when you get to > | > 32-ways and greater, you start seeing cache problems. That was the > | > case on AIX and per-cpu counters was one of the changes that helped > | > get the spectacular scalability on Regatta. > | > | I agree there are large areas of improvement to be done wrt cacheline > | ping ponging (see my patch in 2.4.17-pre6 for one example), but we > | should do our own benchmarking and not look at what AIX has been doing. > > Oh, please! You voiced an opinion. I presented facts. Nobody suggested > we should not measure on Linux. As a matter of fact, I suggested that > Kiran does tests on the real counters and he said he would. Exactly, show me where the current problem is and I will benchmark it on a 16 way linux/ppc64 machine. Your comments are opinions too unless you have some figures to back them up :) Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/