Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:22:07 +0200
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To:     Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays
Message-ID: <Y8j9r7x/NgzegJqr@atomide.com>
References: <20221101221110.17885-1-afd@ti.com>
 <Y2tlXVA6CH/aSzeK@atomide.com>
 <08d41457-9405-b869-4b11-6c93e504bd03@ti.com>
 <Y2ykZpa27FJZXQwt@atomide.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y2ykZpa27FJZXQwt@atomide.com>
Precedence: bulk

* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [221110 07:05]:
> * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]:
> > On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew & Rob,
> > > 
> > > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > > 
> > > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> > > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> > > > wanted to test the water with this one.
> > > > 
> > > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> > > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> > > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> > > > so double checks here very welcome.
> > > > 
> > > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> > > 
> > > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> > > into dt/next") in Linux next.
> > > 
> > > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> > > 
> > 
> > 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
> > commit message. This series works on top of either.
> 
> Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base?

Andrew, I'm untagging these from my inbox, please resend when suitable.

Regards,

Tony